RESOLVED FIXED 85903
Show the chromium non-layout test bots in garden-o-matic
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85903
Summary Show the chromium non-layout test bots in garden-o-matic
Ojan Vafai
Reported 2012-05-08 11:46:07 PDT
Show the chromium non-layout test bots in garden-o-matic
Attachments
Patch (6.80 KB, patch)
2012-05-08 11:47 PDT, Ojan Vafai
no flags
screenshot (8.94 KB, image/png)
2012-05-08 11:48 PDT, Ojan Vafai
no flags
Ojan Vafai
Comment 1 2012-05-08 11:47:17 PDT
Ojan Vafai
Comment 2 2012-05-08 11:48:12 PDT
Created attachment 140756 [details] screenshot
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 3 2012-05-08 15:26:48 PDT
Comment on attachment 140755 [details] Patch Seems reasonable to me. Adam is your best reviewer of course.
Adam Barth
Comment 4 2012-05-08 16:54:08 PDT
I like the approach of iframing buildbot. The label text seems a bit long, but maybe that's just because the screen shot is narrow? Another approach is to just list the names of the bots when they fail (like we do for compile failures). The gtest bots should already be in the JSON blob we fetch from the server, so it might just be a matter of grabbing the information out of there. That said, if you the green/red approach better, that's fine too. :)
Ojan Vafai
Comment 5 2012-05-08 18:39:58 PDT
(In reply to comment #4) > I like the approach of iframing buildbot. The label text seems a bit long, but maybe that's just because the screen shot is narrow? I think it's just the screenshot being narrow. > Another approach is to just list the names of the bots when they fail (like we do for compile failures). The gtest bots should already be in the JSON blob we fetch from the server, so it might just be a matter of grabbing the information out of there. > > That said, if you the green/red approach better, that's fine too. :) We could do that. I just did this because it was easy and visual. Text is more likely to get overlooked. I'll leave it like this for now, but if it bugs you, we can change it.
Ojan Vafai
Comment 6 2012-05-08 18:49:27 PDT
(In reply to comment #4) > Another approach is to just list the names of the bots when they fail (like we do for compile failures). Do we do this for compile failures? The Mac bots are not compiling right now and I don't see anything in garden-o-matic (as a result I missed this for a couple of hours!).
Adam Barth
Comment 7 2012-05-08 18:57:19 PDT
> Do we do this for compile failures? The Mac bots are not compiling right now and I don't see anything in garden-o-matic (as a result I missed this for a couple of hours!). It should say something about "losing test coverage" near the top.
Ojan Vafai
Comment 8 2012-05-08 19:01:00 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > > Do we do this for compile failures? The Mac bots are not compiling right now and I don't see anything in garden-o-matic (as a result I missed this for a couple of hours!). > > It should say something about "losing test coverage" near the top. Nope. Nothing. Looks like this broke at some point.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 9 2012-05-08 19:37:14 PDT
Comment on attachment 140755 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 140755 Committed r116483: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116483>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10 2012-05-08 19:37:18 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.