NEW81824
Our sections' extra logical height distribution algorithm is broken
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81824
Summary Our sections' extra logical height distribution algorithm is broken
Julien Chaffraix
Reported 2012-03-21 12:22:10 PDT
Currently we only allocate the extra logical height to one section. This means that we don't follow at all web-authors' specified height on the sections. This also doesn't match any other browsers which implement a several pass algorithm to handle the different type of height on the sections and on the rows.
Attachments
One example of our broken behavior (604 bytes, text/html)
2012-03-21 12:24 PDT, Julien Chaffraix
no flags
Idea patch (if someone wants to look into that): Unfortunately doesn't handle border-spacing properly (11.17 KB, patch)
2012-06-15 17:59 PDT, Julien Chaffraix
no flags
Zipped test cases for the algorithm, missing coverage for extra logical height distribution at the row level (8.39 KB, application/zip)
2012-09-10 14:44 PDT, Julien Chaffraix
no flags
Julien Chaffraix
Comment 1 2012-03-21 12:24:25 PDT
Created attachment 133095 [details] One example of our broken behavior
Julien Chaffraix
Comment 2 2012-06-15 17:59:43 PDT
Created attachment 147928 [details] Idea patch (if someone wants to look into that): Unfortunately doesn't handle border-spacing properly
Julien Chaffraix
Comment 3 2012-09-10 14:44:50 PDT
Created attachment 163212 [details] Zipped test cases for the algorithm, missing coverage for extra logical height distribution at the row level
Ahmad Saleem
Comment 4 2022-09-10 07:02:29 PDT
All browsers differ in the attached test case: *** Safari Technology Preview 153 *** Just a single container with top and bottom thick (kind of overlapped) border *** Chrome Canary 107 *** Two containers with divided from center and top bottom is thick like overlapped and center as well. *** Firefox Nightly 106 *** Three containers and middle two are thick lines _____ Just wanted to share updated status. Thanks!
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 5 2022-09-10 10:26:25 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.