Bug 81746 - REGRESSION (r111497): fast/css/text-transform-select.html and fast/forms/select/menulist-disabled-option.html is failing
: REGRESSION (r111497): fast/css/text-transform-select.html and fast/forms/sele...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
: WebKit
Layout and Rendering
: 528+ (Nightly build)
: Unspecified Unspecified
: P1 Normal
Assigned To:
:
: InRadar, LayoutTestFailure, Regression
:
: 79764
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-03-21 00:50 PST by
Modified: 2012-03-21 07:21 PST (History)


Attachments


Note

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Description From 2012-03-21 00:50:25 PST
After <http://trac.webkit.org/r111500>, text-transform is not applied to the popup button text in fast/css/text-transform-select.html.
------- Comment #1 From 2012-03-21 00:50:53 PST -------
<rdar://problem/11088942>
------- Comment #2 From 2012-03-21 01:04:33 PST -------
Updated the Mac expected results for this test in <http://trac.webkit.org/r111508>.
------- Comment #4 From 2012-03-21 06:16:05 PST -------
Just a question: Why don't we simple rollout r111497 and let the author fix the regression caused by his patch? We make extra work for us if we commit failing expected files, skip failing tests, etc.
------- Comment #5 From 2012-03-21 06:40:03 PST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Just a question: Why don't we simple rollout r111497 and let the author fix the regression caused by his patch? We make extra work for us if we commit failing expected files, skip failing tests, etc.

Rolled out with gardenings too - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/111532. (rs=Philipp)
------- Comment #6 From 2012-03-21 07:20:29 PST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Just a question: Why don't we simple rollout r111497 and let the author fix the regression caused by his patch? We make extra work for us if we commit failing expected files, skip failing tests, etc.
> 
> Rolled out with gardenings too - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/111532. (rs=Philipp)

Thanks. Is there a reason why you didn’t change this bug’s status to Resolved?
------- Comment #7 From 2012-03-21 07:21:22 PST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Just a question: Why don't we simple rollout r111497 and let the author fix the regression caused by his patch? We make extra work for us if we commit failing expected files, skip failing tests, etc.
> > 
> > Rolled out with gardenings too - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/111532. (rs=Philipp)
> 
> Thanks. Is there a reason why you didn’t change this bug’s status to Resolved?

Yes, I forgot it. :)