For ease of maintainability, attributes and methods declaration order should be as same as specification. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-video-element.html#the-track-element Similar work was done for input element: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79622
Created attachment 129822 [details] Patch 1
This is the last patch of series of Forms related IDL cleanup. (^_^)b
Comment on attachment 129822 [details] Patch 1 r=me
Comment on attachment 129822 [details] Patch 1 View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=129822&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:3 > + [Forms] Make order of attribute/method in HTMLTrackElement.idl as same as specification HTMLTrackElement is not related to Forms.
(In reply to comment #4) > HTMLTrackElement is not related to Forms. Then I am neutral to the change. Generally speaking, ordering IDL attributes per the spec would be a good thing. On the other hand, we do not want to make a refactoring that does not have any benefit. I'd like to delegate the judgement to tkent (i.e. WONTFIX or r+).
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > HTMLTrackElement is not related to Forms. > > Then I am neutral to the change. Generally speaking, ordering IDL attributes per the spec would be a good thing. On the other hand, we do not want to make a refactoring that does not have any benefit. I'd like to delegate the judgement to tkent (i.e. WONTFIX or r+). I'll be ok if we remove [Forms] from the summary.
Created attachment 156260 [details] Patch 2
Created attachment 156261 [details] Patch 3
Comment on attachment 156261 [details] Patch 3 Could you review this patch? Thanks in advance. = Changes since the last review = * Remove "[Forms]" from bug summary and update ChangeLog
Comment on attachment 156261 [details] Patch 3 Looks OK.
Comment on attachment 156261 [details] Patch 3 Clearing flags on attachment: 156261 Committed r124562: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/124562>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.