Bug 77952 - REGRESSION(r106819): ~28% or so performance regression on the ManInBlue HTML benchmark
Summary: REGRESSION(r106819): ~28% or so performance regression on the ManInBlue HTML ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML DOM (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 77879
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-02-07 02:07 PST by Ryosuke Niwa
Modified: 2012-02-07 08:31 PST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Fix attempt (1.88 KB, patch)
2012-02-07 02:13 PST, Ryosuke Niwa 		no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ryosuke Niwa 2012-02-07 02:07:39 PST 
From https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77879:

Comment #4 From Tim Horton 2012-02-06 13:32:31 PST (-) [reply] 
This change seems to significantly (~28% or so) regress performance of the ManInBlue HTML (http://themaninblue.com/experiment/AnimationBenchmark/html/) benchmark, among others. Looking at the change, though, I'm not sure how that's possible. Could you potentially take a look at this?
Comment 1 Ryosuke Niwa 2012-02-07 02:13:12 PST 
Created attachment 125791 [details]
Fix attempt

This is a fix attempt per analysis on the bug 77879. As much as I'd like to finish writing this patch, my brain isn't functioning anymore at 2am in the morning. I'll try to finish up the patch tomorrow if cmarcelo hadn't done so by the time I can get back to it.
Comment 2 Ryosuke Niwa 2012-02-07 02:31:27 PST 
Okay, not adding a new test isn't as bad as I thought. DOM/Accessors caught this regression:

It also caused a regression on DOM/Accessors:
http://webkit-perf.appspot.com/graph.html?#tests=[[3113,2001,32196]]&sel=1328551109987.2344,1328555918820.6528&displayrange=7&datatype=running

It seems like we imported Dromaeo tests just in time :D
Comment 3 Andreas Kling 2012-02-07 04:29:29 PST 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=125791) [details]
> Fix attempt
> 
> This is a fix attempt per analysis on the bug 77879. As much as I'd like to finish writing this patch, my brain isn't functioning anymore at 2am in the morning. I'll try to finish up the patch tomorrow if cmarcelo hadn't done so by the time I can get back to it.

This patch looks fine to me, so I'm taking the liberty of saying r+ and landing it for you to get rid of the regression.
Comment 4 Andreas Kling 2012-02-07 04:29:39 PST 
Committed r106925: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/106925>
Comment 5 Ryosuke Niwa 2012-02-07 08:31:09 PST 
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Created an attachment (id=125791) [details] [details]
> > Fix attempt
> > 
> > This is a fix attempt per analysis on the bug 77879. As much as I'd like to finish writing this patch, my brain isn't functioning anymore at 2am in the morning. I'll try to finish up the patch tomorrow if cmarcelo hadn't done so by the time I can get back to it.
> 
> This patch looks fine to me, so I'm taking the liberty of saying r+ and landing it for you to get rid of the regression.

Thanks!