WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 77175
Import Chromium's dom_perf test
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77175
Summary
Import Chromium's dom_perf test
Ryosuke Niwa
Reported
2012-01-26 19:51:47 PST
Chromium perf bots run dom_perf tests internally developed at Google. However, this test suite hasn't been publicly available despite the fact it has caught a number of webcore regressions. We should import it to WebKit to be ran by run-perf-test.
Attachments
Adds dom_perf
(135.54 KB, patch)
2012-01-26 23:52 PST
,
Ryosuke Niwa
abarth
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 1
2012-01-26 23:52:46 PST
Created
attachment 124266
[details]
Adds dom_perf
Adam Barth
Comment 2
2012-01-27 01:04:29 PST
Comment on
attachment 124266
[details]
Adds dom_perf View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=124266&action=review
Is this the canonical version of this perf test? If not, should we add a README file explaining where to find the canonical version?
> PerformanceTests/ChangeLog:13 > + * ChromiumDOMPerf: Added.
Can we just call it DOMPerf?
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 3
2012-01-27 02:29:55 PST
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> (From update of
attachment 124266
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=124266&action=review
> > Is this the canonical version of this perf test? If not, should we add a README file explaining where to find the canonical version?
By "canonical", do you mean the original version? There's a copy of this benchmark in Google's internal repository but we can't really point to that since it's not publicly available. ChromiumDOMPerf/resources/dom is an exact copy of the original benchmark (except indentation styles and some minor nits). I don't think anyone's working to make the rest of test suite publicly available and I don't plan to.
>> PerformanceTests/ChangeLog:13 >> + * ChromiumDOMPerf: Added. > > Can we just call it DOMPerf?
I want to keep this name to differentiate it from other DOM perf tests will be adding.\
Adam Barth
Comment 4
2012-01-27 02:42:01 PST
> By "canonical", do you mean the original version? There's a copy of this benchmark in Google's internal repository but we can't really point to that since it's not publicly available. ChromiumDOMPerf/resources/dom is an exact copy of the original benchmark (except indentation styles and some minor nits). > > I don't think anyone's working to make the rest of test suite publicly available and I don't plan to.
Ok.
> >> PerformanceTests/ChangeLog:13 > >> + * ChromiumDOMPerf: Added. > > > > Can we just call it DOMPerf? > > I want to keep this name to differentiate it from other DOM perf tests will be adding.\
Maybe we should give it a snappier name then? Maybe something like DOMSpider ? Calling it ChromiumDOMPerf seems to imply that it belongs to Chromium, which isn't really right. It belongs to the WebKit community (or perhaps the open source community at large).
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 5
2012-01-27 14:03:41 PST
Committed
r106147
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/106147
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug