It'd be nice if we could add new modulesets and modules easily using env variables. My main use-case is to include my gst-0.11 moduleset :=)
Created attachment 123277 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 123277 [details] Patch Attachment 123277 [details] did not pass gtk-ews (gtk): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/11297056
Created attachment 123279 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 123279 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=123279&action=review This is a great idea IMO! I'm just wondering whether we should use some kind of namespace protection for our env variables. Maybe make them WebKitExtraModules (or WEBKIT_EXTRA_MODULES), etc. What say you? > Tools/gtk/jhbuildrc:26 > +__module_file_uri = 'file://' + os.path.join(__gtk_tools_directory, 'jhbuild.modules') s/module/moduleset/ for consistency would be good
(In reply to comment #4) > (From update of attachment 123279 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=123279&action=review > > This is a great idea IMO! I'm just wondering whether we should use some kind of namespace protection for our env variables. Maybe make them WebKitExtraModules (or WEBKIT_EXTRA_MODULES), etc. What say you? > I say good idea indeed :) > > Tools/gtk/jhbuildrc:26 > > +__module_file_uri = 'file://' + os.path.join(__gtk_tools_directory, 'jhbuild.modules') > > s/module/moduleset/ for consistency would be good Yup! Will send a new patch!
Created attachment 123291 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 123291 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=123291&action=review > Tools/ChangeLog:11 > + * gtk/jhbuildrc: Extra modulesets and modules can be added in > + JHBuild using the EXTRA_MODULESETS and EXTRA_MODULES env variables > + respectively. Use comma-separated values. Example: > + EXTRA_MODULES=file:///path/to/module.set,file:///other/path. LIES =) the variables changed names
Committed r105519: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/105519>