WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
74688
REGRESSION(
r103005
): bidi-override-in-anonymous-block.html is failing
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74688
Summary
REGRESSION(r103005): bidi-override-in-anonymous-block.html is failing
Hajime Morrita
Reported
2011-12-15 22:51:01 PST
It's not only for Chromium. Mac ports are also breaking. I'm suspecting
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/102875
, but not sure.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Hajime Morrita
Comment 1
2011-12-15 23:46:36 PST
According to the Chromium Builder,
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Chromium%20Linux%20Release%20%28Tests%29
It starts between
r102992
and
r102996
. But there is no doubtful change.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 2
2011-12-16 07:42:29 PST
According to
http://test-results.appspot.com/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#group=%40ToT%20-%20webkit.org&tests=fast%2Fcss%2Fbidi-override-in-anonymous-block.html
This is a regression from
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/103005/
Regression ranges: Chromium Win Release (Tests):
http://trac.webkit.org/log/?verbose=on&rev=103009&stop_rev=103004
Chromium Linux Release (Tests):
http://trac.webkit.org/log/?verbose=on&rev=103006&stop_rev=103001
SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests):
http://trac.webkit.org/log/?verbose=on&rev=103005&stop_rev=103002
And
r103002
-
r103004
can't affect rendering like the way the test is failing.
Darin Adler
Comment 3
2011-12-16 09:57:41 PST
I’m sure Adam will want to fix this, so assigning it to him to formalize that.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 4
2011-12-23 19:40:09 PST
Any update on this regression?
Adam Barth
Comment 5
2011-12-24 11:34:10 PST
Sorry, I didn't realize this was on my plate. I'll investigate on Tuesday.
Adam Barth
Comment 6
2011-12-27 11:13:49 PST
***
Bug 75236
has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Adam Barth
Comment 7
2011-12-27 11:30:18 PST
The new result is correct. This reflects the updated parsing of <rt> inside <rb> elements. I don't fully understand why the HTML5 spec changed in this regard, but from the discussion, it seems like this is the better parsing of ruby elements.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 8
2011-12-27 11:33:20 PST
(In reply to
comment #7
)
> The new result is correct. This reflects the updated parsing of <rt> inside <rb> elements. I don't fully understand why the HTML5 spec changed in this regard, but from the discussion, it seems like this is the better parsing of ruby elements.
Okay. Let's rebaseline then.
Adam Barth
Comment 9
2011-12-27 11:36:07 PST
Committed
r103719
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/103719
>
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 10
2011-12-27 11:53:25 PST
Committed
r103721
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/103721
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug