Bug 74688 - REGRESSION(r103005): bidi-override-in-anonymous-block.html is failing
Summary: REGRESSION(r103005): bidi-override-in-anonymous-block.html is failing
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Layout and Rendering (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P1 Normal
Assignee: Adam Barth
URL:
Keywords:
: 75236 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-12-15 22:51 PST by Hajime Morrita
Modified: 2011-12-27 11:53 PST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hajime Morrita 2011-12-15 22:51:01 PST
It's not only for Chromium. Mac ports are also breaking.
I'm suspecting http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/102875, but not sure.
Comment 1 Hajime Morrita 2011-12-15 23:46:36 PST
According to the Chromium Builder,
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Chromium%20Linux%20Release%20%28Tests%29
It starts between r102992 and r102996. But there is no doubtful change.
Comment 3 Darin Adler 2011-12-16 09:57:41 PST
Iā€™m sure Adam will want to fix this, so assigning it to him to formalize that.
Comment 4 Ryosuke Niwa 2011-12-23 19:40:09 PST
Any update on this regression?
Comment 5 Adam Barth 2011-12-24 11:34:10 PST
Sorry, I didn't realize this was on my plate.  I'll investigate on Tuesday.
Comment 6 Adam Barth 2011-12-27 11:13:49 PST
*** Bug 75236 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Adam Barth 2011-12-27 11:30:18 PST
The new result is correct.  This reflects the updated parsing of <rt> inside <rb> elements.  I don't fully understand why the HTML5 spec changed in this regard, but from the discussion, it seems like this is the better parsing of ruby elements.
Comment 8 Ryosuke Niwa 2011-12-27 11:33:20 PST
(In reply to comment #7)
> The new result is correct.  This reflects the updated parsing of <rt> inside <rb> elements.  I don't fully understand why the HTML5 spec changed in this regard, but from the discussion, it seems like this is the better parsing of ruby elements.

Okay. Let's rebaseline then.
Comment 9 Adam Barth 2011-12-27 11:36:07 PST
Committed r103719: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/103719>
Comment 10 Ryosuke Niwa 2011-12-27 11:53:25 PST
Committed r103721: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/103721>