SSIA
Actually, I should qualify. The RealView compiler (RVCT) was only used by the now-defunct Symbian port of WebKit.
Created attachment 118702 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 118702 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=118702&action=review I am find with the Symbian defines, but the Linux RVCT ones probably need to stay. Let's wait until there are response on WebKit-dev. e.g.: > Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/ExecutableAllocator.cpp:-177 > -#if CPU(ARM_TRADITIONAL) && OS(LINUX) && COMPILER(RVCT) > - > -__asm void ExecutableAllocator::cacheFlush(void* code, size_t size) > -{ > - ARM > - push {r7} > - add r1, r1, r0 > - mov r7, #0xf0000 > - add r7, r7, #0x2 > - mov r2, #0x0 > - svc #0x0 > - pop {r7} > - bx lr > -} > - > -#endif > - I doubt this is related to Symbian's RVCT. > Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/ExecutableAllocator.h:-186 > -#elif CPU(ARM_TRADITIONAL) && OS(LINUX) && COMPILER(RVCT) > - static __asm void cacheFlush(void* code, size_t size); Ditto
Comment on attachment 118702 [details] Patch Attachment 118702 [details] did not pass gtk-ews (gtk): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/10826798
Adding a few people from the Qt port. I believe that the "OS(LINUX) && COMPILER(RVCT)" target was put to support building QtWebKit with RVCT on Linux. Is this configuration still a goal (with Qt5) ?
(In reply to comment #5) > Adding a few people from the Qt port. I believe that the "OS(LINUX) && COMPILER(RVCT)" target was put to support building QtWebKit with RVCT on Linux. > > Is this configuration still a goal (with Qt5) ? Nope, RVCT is not on our radar anymore.
(In reply to comment #5) > Adding a few people from the Qt port. I believe that the "OS(LINUX) && COMPILER(RVCT)" target was put to support building QtWebKit with RVCT on Linux. > > Is this configuration still a goal (with Qt5) ? I am going to ask around a bit if there is any interest about RVDS support.