WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
74216
[chromium] Add three small zoom gesture features
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74216
Summary
[chromium] Add three small zoom gesture features
Alexandre Elias
Reported
2011-12-09 14:27:45 PST
[chromium] Add three small zoom gesture features
Attachments
Patch
(7.38 KB, patch)
2011-12-09 14:44 PST
,
Alexandre Elias
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(12.17 KB, patch)
2012-01-30 16:14 PST
,
Alexandre Elias
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(12.21 KB, patch)
2012-01-30 18:43 PST
,
Alexandre Elias
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(12.17 KB, patch)
2012-01-30 18:49 PST
,
Alexandre Elias
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(12.29 KB, patch)
2012-02-02 21:26 PST
,
Alexandre Elias
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(4)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Alexandre Elias
Comment 1
2011-12-09 14:44:08 PST
Created
attachment 118644
[details]
Patch
Alexandre Elias
Comment 2
2012-01-09 20:49:04 PST
Ping. We should submit this at some point to avoid diverging the branches.
Alexandre Elias
Comment 3
2012-01-30 16:14:23 PST
Created
attachment 124621
[details]
Patch
Alexandre Elias
Comment 4
2012-01-30 16:15:20 PST
Added a unit test.
James Robinson
Comment 5
2012-01-30 18:10:06 PST
Comment on
attachment 124621
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=124621&action=review
Not sure about the .95, everything else looks OK
> Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/chromium/cc/CCLayerTreeHostImpl.cpp:511 > + if (m_prevPinchAnchor == IntPoint())
IntPoint should probably have .isZero() like IntSize does
> Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/chromium/cc/CCLayerTreeHostImpl.cpp:550 > + if (m_pageScaleDelta > 0.95)
this magic number feels really weird. why .95? why aren't we comparing to 1?
> Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/chromium/cc/CCLayerTreeHostImpl.cpp:553 > + // Cmpute where the scroll offset/page scale would be if fully pinch-zoomed
typo "Cmpute"
Alexandre Elias
Comment 6
2012-01-30 18:42:40 PST
(In reply to
comment #5
)
> (From update of
attachment 124621
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=124621&action=review
> > Not sure about the .95, everything else looks OK > > > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/chromium/cc/CCLayerTreeHostImpl.cpp:511 > > + if (m_prevPinchAnchor == IntPoint()) > > IntPoint should probably have .isZero() like IntSize does
Changed to == IntPoint::zero(), which is the closest approximation I can see.
> > > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/chromium/cc/CCLayerTreeHostImpl.cpp:550 > > + if (m_pageScaleDelta > 0.95) > > this magic number feels really weird. why .95? why aren't we comparing to 1?
The idea is not to be too aggressive in triggering this until the gesture is big enough that we think it's going to turn into a substantial zoom out (it could be initial jitter on a zoom in gesture, or an accidental second finger touching the screen -- in those cases, everything going blurry would be distracting).
Alexandre Elias
Comment 7
2012-01-30 18:43:41 PST
Created
attachment 124656
[details]
Patch
Alexandre Elias
Comment 8
2012-01-30 18:49:13 PST
Created
attachment 124658
[details]
Patch
James Robinson
Comment 9
2012-02-02 17:02:39 PST
Comment on
attachment 124658
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=124658&action=review
OK
> Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/chromium/cc/CCLayerTreeHostImpl.cpp:551 > + if (m_pageScaleDelta > 0.95)
i'd weakly prefer that this magic number be made a named constant and defined outside the statement that uses it.
> Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/chromium/cc/CCLayerTreeHostImpl.h:156 > + IntPoint m_prevPinchAnchor;
naming nit: "previous" is better than "prev"
> Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCLayerTreeHostImplTest.cpp:71 > + ASSERT_EQ(scrollDelta.width(), scrollInfo.scrolls[i].scrollDelta.width()); > + ASSERT_EQ(scrollDelta.height(), scrollInfo.scrolls[i].scrollDelta.height());
do we really need to crash the test immediately if these assertions fail, or could these be EXPECT_EQs?
Alexandre Elias
Comment 10
2012-02-02 21:26:18 PST
Created
attachment 125255
[details]
Patch
Alexandre Elias
Comment 11
2012-02-02 21:27:45 PST
OK, made those changes.
James Robinson
Comment 12
2012-02-21 21:08:55 PST
Comment on
attachment 125255
[details]
Patch R=me. Sorry this took so long, just kept forgetting about it.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 13
2012-02-21 21:28:51 PST
Comment on
attachment 125255
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 125255 Committed
r108445
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/108445
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 14
2012-02-21 21:28:56 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug