WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
73937
[chromium] Guard access to WebKitPlatformSupport::currentThread with a null check
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73937
Summary
[chromium] Guard access to WebKitPlatformSupport::currentThread with a null c...
Adam Klein
Reported
2011-12-06 11:18:29 PST
[chromium] Guard access to WebKitPlatformSupport::currentThread with a null check
Attachments
Patch
(2.09 KB, patch)
2011-12-06 11:20 PST
,
Adam Klein
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch for landing
(2.18 KB, patch)
2011-12-06 11:44 PST
,
Adam Klein
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Adam Klein
Comment 1
2011-12-06 11:20:49 PST
Created
attachment 118076
[details]
Patch
Adam Barth
Comment 2
2011-12-06 11:33:21 PST
Comment on
attachment 118076
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=118076&action=review
> Source/WebKit/chromium/ChangeLog:10 > + Though |currentThread| is never null in production code, it is null in > + unit tests (such as Chromium's unit_tests) that call WebKit::initialize() > + without first constructing a MessageLoop.
Can you add this comment to the code as well? We don't want folks cargo-cult copying this null check.
David Levin
Comment 3
2011-12-06 11:40:42 PST
Why is it a bad thing to construct a MessageLoop in the test code?
Adam Klein
Comment 4
2011-12-06 11:44:00 PST
Comment on
attachment 118076
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=118076&action=review
>> Source/WebKit/chromium/ChangeLog:10 >> + without first constructing a MessageLoop. > > Can you add this comment to the code as well? We don't want folks cargo-cult copying this null check.
Done.
Adam Klein
Comment 5
2011-12-06 11:44:17 PST
Created
attachment 118081
[details]
Patch for landing
David Levin
Comment 6
2011-12-06 11:45:15 PST
Comment on
attachment 118081
[details]
Patch for landing Just blocking for the moment since there is an unanswered question.
Adam Klein
Comment 7
2011-12-06 11:50:14 PST
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> Why is it a bad thing to construct a MessageLoop in the test code?
It's not so much that tests don't construct MessageLoops, but that each test case inside, e.g., unit_tests wants to have control over its own MessageLoop. For example, some tests need an IO loop, others might need a UI loop. And only one can exist per thread. So at initialization time (presumably during test startup), there's no loop, even if each test case creates a loop later (in its GTest test fixture).
David Levin
Comment 8
2011-12-06 11:52:56 PST
Comment on
attachment 118081
[details]
Patch for landing Thanks! Sorry for the hold up.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 9
2011-12-06 13:06:39 PST
Comment on
attachment 118081
[details]
Patch for landing Clearing flags on attachment: 118081 Committed
r102171
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/102171
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10
2011-12-06 13:06:44 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug