RESOLVED FIXED 72587
Web Inspector: get rid of Panel::reset in the front-end.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72587
Summary Web Inspector: get rid of Panel::reset in the front-end.
Pavel Feldman
Reported 2011-11-17 01:29:33 PST
Patch to follow.
Attachments
Patch (21.51 KB, patch)
2011-11-17 02:04 PST, Pavel Feldman
no flags
Patch (18.71 KB, patch)
2011-11-18 05:55 PST, Pavel Feldman
no flags
[Patch] Same with reset removed from protocol. (27.55 KB, patch)
2011-11-18 07:47 PST, Pavel Feldman
yurys: review+
webkit.review.bot: commit-queue-
Pavel Feldman
Comment 1 2011-11-17 02:04:20 PST
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 2 2011-11-17 02:32:43 PST
Comment on attachment 115544 [details] Patch Attachment 115544 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/10461108 New failing tests: inspector/extensions/extensions-events.html
Timothy Hatcher
Comment 3 2011-11-17 07:48:10 PST
Comment on attachment 115544 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=115544&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:4 > + Web Inspector: get rid of Panel::reset in the front-end. > + https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72587 Please describe the reason/motivation for these changes. I've been trying to get back into the inspector code and not having good descriptions for changes are unhelpful. I'm going to r- any change that does not have a useful description/motivation. The bugilla bug doesn't help either. The same goes for describing what changes are in the methods in the ChangeLog. > Source/WebCore/inspector/InspectorInstrumentation.cpp:-647 > -#if ENABLE(JAVASCRIPT_DEBUGGER) > - if (InspectorDebuggerAgent* debuggerAgent = instrumentingAgents->inspectorDebuggerAgent()) { > - KURL url = inspectorAgent->inspectedURLWithoutFragment(); > - debuggerAgent->inspectedURLChanged(url); > - } > -#endif Is this now assumed? > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ApplicationCacheModel.js:70 > - var frameId = event.data; > - this._frameManifestRemoved(frameId); > + var frame = event.data; > + this._frameManifestRemoved(frame.id); Seems unrelated to this change. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ElementsPanel.js:345 > - this._highlightCurrentSearchResult(true); > + this._highlightCurrentSearchResult(); Seems unrelated to this change. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ElementsPanel.js:357 > - this._highlightCurrentSearchResult(false); > + this._highlightCurrentSearchResult(); Seems unrelated to this change. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/JavaScriptContextManager.js:65 > - var frameId = event.data; > - var context = this._frameIdToContext[frameId]; > + var frame = event.data; > + var context = this._frameIdToContext[frame.id]; Seems unrelated to this change. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/JavaScriptContextManager.js:69 > - delete this._frameIdToContext[frameId]; > + delete this._frameIdToContext[frame.id]; Seems unrelated to this change. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/JavaScriptContextManager.js:98 > - return this._frame.id > + return this._frame.id; Seems unrelated to this change. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ResourceTreeModel.js:189 > - this.dispatchEventToListeners(WebInspector.ResourceTreeModel.EventTypes.FrameDetached, frameId); > + this.dispatchEventToListeners(WebInspector.ResourceTreeModel.EventTypes.FrameDetached, frame); Seems unrelated to this change. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ResourceTreeModel.js:312 > - this.dispatchEventToListeners(WebInspector.ResourceTreeModel.EventTypes.FrameDetached, subframes[i].id); > + this.dispatchEventToListeners(WebInspector.ResourceTreeModel.EventTypes.FrameDetached, subframes[i]); Seems unrelated to this change. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ResourcesPanel.js:230 > + // Reset on main frame detach > + this._reset(); It seems odd that the main frame can detach. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ResourcesPanel.js:237 > - delete this._treeElementForFrameId[frameId]; > + delete this._treeElementForFrameId[frame.id]; Seems unrelated to this change. > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/externs.js:183 > +} Wrong patch? > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/inspector.js:675 > WebInspector.reset = function() > { So what is reset called for now? Why do we need this still? > Source/WebCore/inspector/generate-protocol-externs:73 > +def dash_to_camelcase(word): > + return "".join(x.capitalize() or "-" for x in word.split("-")) Wrong patch? > Source/WebCore/inspector/generate-protocol-externs:166 > + if "capabilities" in domain: > + for capability in domain["capabilities"]: > + output_file.write("/** @type {string} */\n") > + output_file.write("%sAgent.capability%s;\n" % (domain_name, dash_to_camelcase(capability["name"]))); Wrong patch?
Pavel Feldman
Comment 4 2011-11-18 05:21:23 PST
Comment on attachment 115544 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=115544&action=review I'll extract compilation fixes from this patch. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/InspectorInstrumentation.cpp:-647 >> -#endif > > Is this now assumed? We are now resetting debugger state upon windowObjectCleared event. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ApplicationCacheModel.js:70 >> + this._frameManifestRemoved(frame.id); > > Seems unrelated to this change. This is related to this change, event's data is now frame, not frame's id. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ElementsPanel.js:345 >> + this._highlightCurrentSearchResult(); > > Seems unrelated to this change. This method does not accept parameters. JS compilation failed and I applied the drive-by fix. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/JavaScriptContextManager.js:65 >> + var context = this._frameIdToContext[frame.id]; > > Seems unrelated to this change. Related. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/JavaScriptContextManager.js:98 >> + return this._frame.id; > > Seems unrelated to this change. Related. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ResourceTreeModel.js:189 >> + this.dispatchEventToListeners(WebInspector.ResourceTreeModel.EventTypes.FrameDetached, frame); > > Seems unrelated to this change. This is related. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ResourceTreeModel.js:312 > > Seems unrelated to this change. This is related. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ResourcesPanel.js:230 >> + this._reset(); > > It seems odd that the main frame can detach. We generate this event for navigation. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ResourcesPanel.js:237 >> + delete this._treeElementForFrameId[frame.id]; > > Seems unrelated to this change. ditto >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/externs.js:183 >> +} > > Wrong patch? Also a drive-by for compilation fix. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/inspector.js:675 >> { > > So what is reset called for now? Why do we need this still? I'll remote it as soon as the two calls below are also eliminated. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/generate-protocol-externs:73 >> + return "".join(x.capitalize() or "-" for x in word.split("-")) > > Wrong patch? Drive-by compilation fix. >> Source/WebCore/inspector/generate-protocol-externs:166 >> + output_file.write("%sAgent.capability%s;\n" % (domain_name, dash_to_camelcase(capability["name"]))); > > Wrong patch? Drive-by compilation fix.
Pavel Feldman
Comment 5 2011-11-18 05:55:08 PST
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 6 2011-11-18 06:39:50 PST
Comment on attachment 115794 [details] Patch Attachment 115794 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/10393143 New failing tests: inspector/extensions/extensions-events.html
Pavel Feldman
Comment 7 2011-11-18 07:47:01 PST
Created attachment 115807 [details] [Patch] Same with reset removed from protocol.
Yury Semikhatsky
Comment 8 2011-11-18 08:01:00 PST
Comment on attachment 115807 [details] [Patch] Same with reset removed from protocol. View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=115807&action=review > Source/WebCore/inspector/Inspector.json:1959 > + "name": "globalObjectCleared", This event should contain identifier of the global object that was cleared. But since now we don't have such entity in the protocol we may add it later.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 9 2011-11-18 08:20:04 PST
Comment on attachment 115807 [details] [Patch] Same with reset removed from protocol. Attachment 115807 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/10495133 New failing tests: inspector/extensions/extensions-events.html
Pavel Feldman
Comment 10 2011-11-21 05:37:22 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.