RESOLVED FIXED 71911
[Qt] Enable skipped but now passing tests (http/tests)
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71911
Summary [Qt] Enable skipped but now passing tests (http/tests)
Zoltan Arvai
Reported 2011-11-09 07:16:53 PST
"run-webkit-tests --no-launch-safari --no-sample-on-timeout --no-new-test-results --results-directory layout-test-results --use-remote-links-to-tests --release --qt --force http/tests" is resulting a resonable amount of "Expected to fail, but passed" tests. This should be examined and passing tests should be unskipped. https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-qt/2011-November/002078.html
Attachments
http-unskip (8.29 KB, patch)
2011-11-14 06:10 PST, Zoltan Arvai
no flags
Zoltan Arvai
Comment 1 2011-11-14 06:10:37 PST
Created attachment 114930 [details] http-unskip Remove 28 tests from Skipped. Those tests passes with Qt 4.8.0-rc1 without side effects.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 2 2011-11-14 06:14:04 PST
Comment on attachment 114930 [details] http-unskip View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=114930&action=review > LayoutTests/platform/qt/Skipped:-2494 > -# [Qt] http/tests/notifications/icon-does-not-exist.html makes fast/notifications/notifications-click-event.html fail > -# https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71693 > -http/tests/notifications/icon-does-not-exist.html > - We shouldn't remove this one, because it makes fast/notifications/notifications-click-event.html :)
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 3 2011-11-14 08:49:48 PST
Comment on attachment 114930 [details] http-unskip View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=114930&action=review Otherwise LGTM, let's land it tomorrow after one more test. > LayoutTests/platform/qt/Skipped:-2178 > -# new test introduced in r88958, but fail on Qt > -# https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62741 > -http/tests/appcache/video.html This test still fails for me. >> LayoutTests/platform/qt/Skipped:-2494 >> -# [Qt] http/tests/notifications/icon-does-not-exist.html makes fast/notifications/notifications-click-event.html fail >> -# https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71693 >> -http/tests/notifications/icon-does-not-exist.html >> - > > We shouldn't remove this one, because it makes fast/notifications/notifications-click-event.html :) We shouldn't remove this one, because it makes fast/notifications/notifications-click-event.html :)
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 4 2011-11-15 06:43:28 PST
Comment on attachment 114930 [details] http-unskip View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=114930&action=review Otherwise LGTM, let's land it tomorrow after one more test. > LayoutTests/platform/qt/Skipped:-566 > -# [Qt] http/tests/misc/link-rel-icon-beforeload.html is flakey > -# https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63518 > -http/tests/misc/link-rel-icon-beforeload.html > - Still fails. >> LayoutTests/platform/qt/Skipped:-2178 >> -# new test introduced in r88958, but fail on Qt >> -# https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62741 >> -http/tests/appcache/video.html > > This test still fails for me. This test still fails for me. >>> LayoutTests/platform/qt/Skipped:-2494 >>> -# [Qt] http/tests/notifications/icon-does-not-exist.html makes fast/notifications/notifications-click-event.html fail >>> -# https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71693 >>> -http/tests/notifications/icon-does-not-exist.html >>> - >> >> We shouldn't remove this one, because it makes fast/notifications/notifications-click-event.html :) > > We shouldn't remove this one, because it makes fast/notifications/notifications-click-event.html :) We shouldn't remove this one, because it makes fast/notifications/notifications-click-event.html :)
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 5 2011-11-15 08:00:19 PST
Comment on attachment 114930 [details] http-unskip Fixed patch landed in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/100281
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 6 2011-11-16 08:15:05 PST
Reopen, because it was rolled out by http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/100281. But it seems this patch is absolutely innocent. :) I'll reland it tomorrow.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 7 2011-11-17 07:42:58 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.