WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
70619
REGRESSION (
r97496
-
r97499
): 6 fast/workers tests failing on SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests)
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70619
Summary
REGRESSION (r97496-r97499): 6 fast/workers tests failing on SnowLeopard Intel...
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Reported
2011-10-21 10:46:14 PDT
The following tests started failing on SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests) between
r97497
and
r97499
(inclusive): fast/workers/shared-worker-lifecycle.html fast/workers/shared-worker-frame-lifecycle.html fast/workers/storage/interrupt-database.html fast/workers/worker-close-more.html fast/workers/dedicated-worker-lifecycle.html fast/workers/worker-lifecycle.html
http://trac.webkit.org/log/trunk?rev=97499&stop_rev=97497&limit=4
http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(Tests)/r97496%20(33906)/results.html
passed
http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(Tests)/r97499%20(33907)/results.html
failed
Attachments
Patch
(1.57 KB, patch)
2011-12-09 14:14 PST
,
David Levin
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 1
2011-10-21 10:46:34 PDT
Please can you try to make these workers tests less flakey? They cause so much bot redness.
David Levin
Comment 2
2011-10-21 11:01:28 PDT
Adding dslomov as fyi. I think Drew added most of these except for the interrupt-database one which I think Michael owns. I think everyone is booked at the moment but hopefully one of us will be able to look at this soon.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 3
2011-11-02 17:10:06 PDT
We need to get these workers tests skipped, or passing. Their flakiness is not acceptable.
David Levin
Comment 4
2011-11-02 17:14:41 PDT
Feel free to skip them unless someone volunteers to fix them (which doesn't look like it is happening at present).
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 5
2011-11-02 17:16:51 PDT
Skipped in
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/99125
Andrew Wilson
Comment 6
2011-11-02 17:19:19 PDT
Yeah, if you look at the failures, they look to be DRT failures more than anything else. Looking at fast/workers/resources/worker-lifecycle.js: if (window.layoutTestController) { layoutTestController.dumpAsText(); layoutTestController.waitUntilDone(); waitUntilWorkerThreadsExit(runTests); } else { log("NOTE: Test relies on window.layoutTestController to detect when worker threads have exited. Please run this test via DumpRenderTree"); waitUntilWorkerThreadsExit(runTests); } function runTests() { if (window.layoutTestController) log("PASS: workerThreadCount = " + layoutTestController.workerThreadCount); I don't see how it's possible for the test output to be missing "PASS: workerThreadCount =" unless layoutTestController.workerThreadCount() just blocks. So, yeah, it'd be nice for someone to diagnose why DRT is not working with workers on the bots, but it doesn't specifically look like a failure in the worker code.
David Levin
Comment 7
2011-11-02 17:22:59 PDT
I think all of these tests rely on waitUntilWorkerThreadsExit which to my memory is just plain flaky for jsc due to how garbage collection is done there. I think Drew Wilson tried to fix this but it was usually a form of let's try this because it is hard to force the gc to happen and recognize that an object is not referred to anymore. I bet they started failing due to all the gc changes that have been happening and I suspect that it isn't worth the trouble to keep them running on jsc. (I believe they work for v8 and this in turn will test the shared code in WebKit for this stuff which is the most important thing.)
Andrew Wilson
Comment 8
2011-11-02 17:27:30 PDT
Still not 100% clear why we're not getting *any* output, but maybe if we get a timeout we don't dump the current text contents of the DOM (clearly my WebKit-fu is getting rusty).
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 9
2011-11-02 17:28:08 PDT
cc some JSC/GC folks.
David Levin
Comment 10
2011-12-07 14:53:58 PST
I bet this is the same as 71695. If so, this is related to changing to NRWT. After landing that fix, I'll unskip these and we'll see if they start passing, so I'll take this for now.
David Levin
Comment 11
2011-12-09 14:14:26 PST
Created
attachment 118635
[details]
Patch
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 12
2011-12-09 14:23:46 PST
Comment on
attachment 118635
[details]
Patch This kind of change generally doesn't need review.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 13
2011-12-09 18:26:59 PST
Comment on
attachment 118635
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 118635 Committed
r102510
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/102510
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 14
2011-12-09 18:27:04 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug