Bug 70523 – Web Inspector: get rid of View::hide, View::set visible, View::attach.

• Status: RESOLVED
• Resolution: FIXED
• Component: Web Inspector (Deprecated)

[Pavel Feldman]

This change streamlines the way we operate views.

[Pavel Feldman]

Created attachment 111806 [details]
Patch

[Yury Semikhatsky]

Comment on attachment 111806 [details]
Patch

Removing r? as pfeldman is still working on it.

[Pavel Feldman]

Created attachment 111928 [details]
[Patch] same with asserions instead of DOM listeners

[Pavel Feldman]

Created attachment 111956 [details]
[Patch] Same with the test.

[Andrey Kosyakov]

Comment on attachment 111956 [details]
[Patch] Same with the test.

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=111956&action=review

LGTM with a handful of nits. Some other considerations that may be addressed in the future patches:
- we now lack a method to dispose of a view that was marked with setHideOnDetach(). Such views would linger in DOM forever, as detach would not really detach them;
-- Managing isRoot is a bit obscure (we set it explicitly but may implicitly clear)
-- We never call base implementations of willHide/wasShown from Views, yet always call from Panels. This is inconsistent. We also have some logic in dispatchFoo methods, which is a bit confusing considering these names.

> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:50
> +        return this._isShowing || this._isRoot;

So does this mean that a view that was once marked as root will remain isShowing() after being detached?

> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:69
>          this.restoreScrollPositions();

Having logic like this in a method called dispatchSomething is a bit surprising.

> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:82
>          this.storeScrollPositions();

ditto.

> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:141
> +        while (parentElement && !parentElement.__view)
> +            parentElement = parentElement.parentElement;

Reusing input parameter is confusing. Consider var parentViewElement?

> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:258
> +    while (parentElement) {

nit: for seems more appropriate

> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:264
> +WebInspector.View._decrementViewCounter = function(parentElement, childElement)

nit: Generalize with _incrementViewCounter, e.g. adjustViewCounter?

[Pavel Feldman]

> So does this mean that a view that was once marked as root will remain isShowing() after being detached?

I don't see a better solution for now. Root is the main panels + drawer view. I'll figure something prettier out.

> Having logic like this in a method called dispatchSomething is a bit surprising.

Done.

> > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:82
> >          this.storeScrollPositions();
> 
Done.

> > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:141
> > +        while (parentElement && !parentElement.__view)
> > +            parentElement = parentElement.parentElement;
> 
> Reusing input parameter is confusing. Consider var parentViewElement?


Done.

> > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:258
> > +    while (parentElement) {
> 
> nit: for seems more appropriate

Changed this code a bit.

> > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:264
> > +WebInspector.View._decrementViewCounter = function(parentElement, childElement)
> 
> nit: Generalize with _incrementViewCounter, e.g. adjustViewCounter?

I am not a fan of this :).

[Pavel Feldman]

Created attachment 111966 [details]
[Patch] Review comments addressed.

[Andrey Kosyakov]

Comment on attachment 111966 [details]
[Patch] Review comments addressed.

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=111966&action=review

> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:277
> +WebInspector.View._assert = function(condition, message)

This looks generic enough to be in utilities.js

[Yury Semikhatsky]

Comment on attachment 111966 [details]
[Patch] Review comments addressed.

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=111966&action=review

> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/View.js:175
> +            if (childIndex < 0) {

Could be _assert

[Pavel Feldman]

Committed r98194: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/98194>