Bug 67372 - [chromium] Move ImageBuffer::platformLayer()
Summary: [chromium] Move ImageBuffer::platformLayer()
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New Bugs (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: noel gordon
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-09-01 00:52 PDT by noel gordon
Modified: 2011-09-01 18:57 PDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Patch (1.87 KB, patch)
2011-09-01 01:00 PDT, noel gordon
no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description noel gordon 2011-09-01 00:52:25 PDT
Have some toDataURL() related work upcoming and platformLayer() is sitting right in the
middle of it :)  Hope you don't mind my moving out of the way.
Comment 1 noel gordon 2011-09-01 01:00:06 PDT
Created attachment 105919 [details]
Patch
Comment 2 noel gordon 2011-09-01 01:27:59 PDT
And curious, does this routine need a #if USE(ACCELERATED_COMPOSITING) guard?  A cursory look at 
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/93157/trunk/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/ImageBuffer.h made
me think so.
Comment 3 Kenneth Russell 2011-09-01 11:45:46 PDT
Comment on attachment 105919 [details]
Patch

This looks fine.
Comment 4 Kenneth Russell 2011-09-01 11:46:35 PDT
(In reply to comment #2)
> And curious, does this routine need a #if USE(ACCELERATED_COMPOSITING) guard?  A cursory look at 
> http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/93157/trunk/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/ImageBuffer.h made
> me think so.

Not sure -- it's been a while since we compiled without that flag so there might be several compilation errors throughout the code base.
Comment 5 WebKit Review Bot 2011-09-01 12:39:24 PDT
Comment on attachment 105919 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 105919

Committed r94332: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/94332>
Comment 6 WebKit Review Bot 2011-09-01 12:39:28 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.
Comment 7 noel gordon 2011-09-01 18:57:46 PDT
(In reply to comment #4)
> Not sure -- it's been a while since we compiled without that flag so there might be several compilation errors throughout the code base.

OK thanks, so long as we know it.