WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
ASSIGNED
66962
WebCore or WTF RunLoop abstraction
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66962
Summary
WebCore or WTF RunLoop abstraction
Nat Duca
Reported
2011-08-25 11:19:03 PDT
WK2 and Chromium both have embedder-specific abstractions for a thread that runs tasks, e.g. - WebKit2/platform/RunLoop.h - WebKit/chromium/public/WebThread.h I'm wondering if we should have a generalized version of these abstractions available in WebCore. Two systems that could be refactored to use this: - WebCore/fileapi/FileThread - WebCore/platform/chromium/CCThread Are there other use cases? Should we actually do this?
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Anders Carlsson
Comment 1
2011-08-26 10:45:35 PDT
(In reply to
comment #0
)
> WK2 and Chromium both have embedder-specific abstractions for a thread that runs tasks, e.g. > - WebKit2/platform/RunLoop.h > - WebKit/chromium/public/WebThread.h > > I'm wondering if we should have a generalized version of these abstractions available in WebCore. > > Two systems that could be refactored to use this: > - WebCore/fileapi/FileThread > - WebCore/platform/chromium/CCThread > > Are there other use cases? Should we actually do this?
FWIW, the WebKit2 RunLoop class is just a platform abstraction for a system run loop. We also have a WorkQueue class which is a light-weight thread (on OS X it's actually a libdispatch queue) that can run tasks. It would definitely be worth moving them down to either WebCore or even WTF.
Sam Weinig
Comment 2
2011-08-26 10:51:16 PDT
> It would definitely be worth moving them down to either WebCore or even WTF.
The tentative plan is to move them to WTF.
Nat Duca
Comment 3
2011-08-26 10:52:33 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> > It would definitely be worth moving them down to either WebCore or even WTF. > > The tentative plan is to move them to WTF.
Cool. To ask a dumb question, can you have run loops for things != the main thread in the Wk2 abstraction?
Anders Carlsson
Comment 4
2011-08-26 10:53:35 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (In reply to
comment #2
) > > > It would definitely be worth moving them down to either WebCore or even WTF. > > > > The tentative plan is to move them to WTF. > > > Cool. To ask a dumb question, can you have run loops for things != the main thread in the Wk2 abstraction?
Yes, the run loop objects are allocated in thread-specific storage.
Nat Duca
Comment 5
2011-08-26 10:55:34 PDT
Awesome. That sounds like a great building block... is there a bug for that that I should merge this into?
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug