WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
66293
[EFL] Fix and update doxygen documentation for ewk_view
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66293
Summary
[EFL] Fix and update doxygen documentation for ewk_view
Grzegorz Czajkowski
Reported
2011-08-16 05:26:19 PDT
This patch - fixes method descriptions, - adds briefs for structure and typdef, - removes dots from descriptions of parameter and return command (see EFL's documentation), - move includes and defines below a brief of ewk_view.h.
Attachments
proposed patch
(95.94 KB, patch)
2011-08-16 05:31 PDT
,
Grzegorz Czajkowski
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch #1 (changes in ewk_view.cpp)
(1.66 KB, patch)
2011-08-19 06:05 PDT
,
Grzegorz Czajkowski
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch #2 (changes in ewk_view.h) - typedefs and structs descriptions
(11.28 KB, patch)
2011-08-19 06:16 PDT
,
Grzegorz Czajkowski
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch #3 (changes in ewk_view.h) - API descriptions part1
(40.20 KB, patch)
2011-08-19 06:18 PDT
,
Grzegorz Czajkowski
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch #4 (changes in ewk_view.h) - API descriptions part2
(45.01 KB, patch)
2011-08-19 06:18 PDT
,
Grzegorz Czajkowski
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Grzegorz Czajkowski
Comment 1
2011-08-16 05:31:18 PDT
Created
attachment 104029
[details]
proposed patch
Leandro Pereira
Comment 2
2011-08-16 09:55:23 PDT
Could you please try splitting this into multiple patches?
Grzegorz Czajkowski
Comment 3
2011-08-17 02:16:31 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> Could you please try splitting this into multiple patches?
I agree with you that this patch is huge. What is your proposition to splitting this patch? What will you say about: patch #1 - changes in ewk_view.cpp + ChangeLog patch #2 - changes in ewk_view.h (typedefs and structs description) + ChangeLog patch #3 - API documentation part 1 + ChangeLog (ewk_view.h) patch #4 - API documentation part 2 (settings) + ChangeLog (ewk_view.h) These patches will be related with the same bug, they will have the same ChangeLog.
Leandro Pereira
Comment 4
2011-08-17 07:48:24 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (In reply to
comment #2
) > > Could you please try splitting this into multiple patches? > > I agree with you that this patch is huge. What is your proposition to splitting this patch? What will you say about: > > patch #1 - changes in ewk_view.cpp + ChangeLog > patch #2 - changes in ewk_view.h (typedefs and structs description) + ChangeLog > patch #3 - API documentation part 1 + ChangeLog (ewk_view.h) > patch #4 - API documentation part 2 (settings) + ChangeLog (ewk_view.h) > > These patches will be related with the same bug, they will have the same > ChangeLog.
> Looks like a plan.
Grzegorz Czajkowski
Comment 5
2011-08-17 07:58:52 PDT
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (In reply to
comment #3
) > > (In reply to
comment #2
) > > > Could you please try splitting this into multiple patches? > > > > I agree with you that this patch is huge. What is your proposition to splitting this patch? What will you say about: > > > > patch #1 - changes in ewk_view.cpp + ChangeLog > > patch #2 - changes in ewk_view.h (typedefs and structs description) + ChangeLog > > patch #3 - API documentation part 1 + ChangeLog (ewk_view.h) > > patch #4 - API documentation part 2 (settings) + ChangeLog (ewk_view.h) > > > > These patches will be related with the same bug, they will have the same > > ChangeLog. > > > > Looks like a plan.
It's only proposition :) I didn't split a patch into smaller ones before. I don't know what are general rules for that. Have you ever experienced similar case?
Gyuyoung Kim
Comment 6
2011-08-19 00:46:17 PDT
Hello Kent, First of all, sorry for adding CC. I have a question. Grzegorz refines descriptions of ewk_view's APIs. However, this patch is a little huge. I'm not sure if we should split this patch into smaller ones. Should this patch be splited into more smaller patches ?
Kent Tamura
Comment 7
2011-08-19 01:06:41 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> Hello Kent, > > First of all, sorry for adding CC. I have a question. > > Grzegorz refines descriptions of ewk_view's APIs. However, this patch is a little huge. I'm not sure if we should split this patch into smaller ones. Should this patch be splited into more smaller patches ?
We should reduce the patch size as possible in general. It seems we can split this patch easily.
Gyuyoung Kim
Comment 8
2011-08-19 01:35:18 PDT
(In reply to
comment #7
)
> (In reply to
comment #6
) > > Hello Kent, > > > > First of all, sorry for adding CC. I have a question. > > > > Grzegorz refines descriptions of ewk_view's APIs. However, this patch is a little huge. I'm not sure if we should split this patch into smaller ones. Should this patch be splited into more smaller patches ? > > We should reduce the patch size as possible in general. > It seems we can split this patch easily.
Ok, I will guide we should not make huge patch regardless patch is major or minor in future.
Grzegorz Czajkowski
Comment 9
2011-08-19 02:00:38 PDT
(In reply to
comment #7
)
> (In reply to
comment #6
) > > Hello Kent, > > > > First of all, sorry for adding CC. I have a question. > > > > Grzegorz refines descriptions of ewk_view's APIs. However, this patch is a little huge. I'm not sure if we should split this patch into smaller ones. Should this patch be splited into more smaller patches ? > > We should reduce the patch size as possible in general. > It seems we can split this patch easily.
Do you mean that I should split the patch into the few bugs? Or should I attach multiple patches to this bug? If second what to do with ChageLog? Does the same ChangeLog should be attached to each patch? (the most changes are included in ewk_view.h)
Kent Tamura
Comment 10
2011-08-19 02:17:22 PDT
(In reply to
comment #9
)
> Do you mean that I should split the patch into the few bugs? Or should I attach multiple patches to this bug? If second what to do with ChageLog? Does the same ChangeLog should be attached to each patch? (the most changes are included in ewk_view.h)
Both are ok. But many reviewers prefer one patch per one bug. Each patch should have its ChangeLog anyway.
Grzegorz Czajkowski
Comment 11
2011-08-19 06:05:42 PDT
Created
attachment 104497
[details]
patch #1 (changes in ewk_view.cpp)
Grzegorz Czajkowski
Comment 12
2011-08-19 06:16:07 PDT
Created
attachment 104499
[details]
patch #2 (changes in ewk_view.h) - typedefs and structs descriptions
Grzegorz Czajkowski
Comment 13
2011-08-19 06:18:09 PDT
Created
attachment 104500
[details]
patch #3 (changes in ewk_view.h) - API descriptions part1
Grzegorz Czajkowski
Comment 14
2011-08-19 06:18:54 PDT
Created
attachment 104501
[details]
patch #4 (changes in ewk_view.h) - API descriptions part2
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 15
2011-08-19 07:12:45 PDT
Comment on
attachment 104497
[details]
patch #1 (changes in ewk_view.cpp) Clearing flags on attachment: 104497 Committed
r93401
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/93401
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 16
2011-08-20 21:50:35 PDT
Comment on
attachment 104499
[details]
patch #2 (changes in ewk_view.h) - typedefs and structs descriptions Clearing flags on attachment: 104499 Committed
r93485
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/93485
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 17
2011-08-20 22:14:20 PDT
Comment on
attachment 104500
[details]
patch #3 (changes in ewk_view.h) - API descriptions part1 Clearing flags on attachment: 104500 Committed
r93486
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/93486
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 18
2011-08-20 22:27:55 PDT
Comment on
attachment 104501
[details]
patch #4 (changes in ewk_view.h) - API descriptions part2 Clearing flags on attachment: 104501 Committed
r93488
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/93488
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 19
2011-08-20 22:28:00 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug