garden-o-matic's analyzeUnexpectedFailures needs a completion callback.

[Dimitri Glazkov (Google)]

garden-o-matic's analyzeUnexpectedFailures needs a completion callback.

[Dimitri Glazkov (Google)]

Created attachment 103814 [details]
Patch

[Adam Barth]

Comment on attachment 103814 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=103814&action=review

> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/build.webkit.org-config/public_html/TestFailures/main.js:292
> +        model.analyzeUnexpectedFailures(showUnexpectedFailure, function() {
> +            dismissButterbar();
> +        });

You can just pass dismissButterbar as the completion callback.  You don't need the thunk.

> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/build.webkit.org-config/public_html/TestFailures/model.js:126
> +    var queriesInFlight = Object.keys(unexpectedFailures).length;

please use base.RequestTracker.

[Dimitri Glazkov (Google)]

Created attachment 103833 [details]
Patch

[Adam Barth]

Comment on attachment 103833 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=103833&action=review

> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/build.webkit.org-config/public_html/TestFailures/base.js:114
> +    this._tryCallback();

Did you check the other call sites to see what they thought of this new behavior?  I seem to remember a bunch of them doing this manually.

> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/build.webkit.org-config/public_html/TestFailures/base.js:117
> +base.RequestTracker.prototype = {

I prefer the other style of modifying the prototype, but whatever.

> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/build.webkit.org-config/public_html/TestFailures/model.js:126
> +    var tracker = new base.RequestTracker(Object.keys(unexpectedFailures).length, completionCallback);

Why Object.keys and not base.keys ?  Should base.keys == Object.keys when Object.keys is available?

[Dimitri Glazkov (Google)]

Comment on attachment 103833 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=103833&action=review

>> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/build.webkit.org-config/public_html/TestFailures/base.js:114
>> +    this._tryCallback();
> 
> Did you check the other call sites to see what they thought of this new behavior?  I seem to remember a bunch of them doing this manually.

Yep. I did. There were only two other callsites.

>> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/build.webkit.org-config/public_html/TestFailures/base.js:117
>> +base.RequestTracker.prototype = {
> 
> I prefer the other style of modifying the prototype, but whatever.

:)

[Dimitri Glazkov (Google)]

Comment on attachment 103833 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 103833

Committed r93016: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/93016>

[Dimitri Glazkov (Google)]

All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.