RESOLVED FIXED 65238
[EFL] Introduce AssertMatchingEnums.cpp.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
Summary [EFL] Introduce AssertMatchingEnums.cpp.
Ryuan Choi
Reported 2011-07-27 01:24:09 PDT
Patch will be added.
Attachments
Patch (9.20 KB, patch)
2011-07-27 01:29 PDT, Ryuan Choi
no flags
typo_fixed (9.22 KB, patch)
2011-07-27 04:49 PDT, Ryuan Choi
no flags
Patch (9.74 KB, patch)
2011-07-27 18:59 PDT, Ryuan Choi
no flags
Patch (2.09 KB, patch)
2011-07-29 05:25 PDT, Ryuan Choi
no flags
Patch (16.25 KB, patch)
2011-11-06 20:36 PST, Ryuan Choi
no flags
Ryuan Choi
Comment 1 2011-07-27 01:29:46 PDT
Gyuyoung Kim
Comment 2 2011-07-27 01:58:56 PDT
Comment on attachment 102105 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=102105&action=review > Source/WebKit/efl/ewk/ewk_frame.h:153 > EWK_TOUCH_POINT_MOVED, Is it better to sort by alphabetic order ?
Ryuan Choi
Comment 3 2011-07-27 02:09:59 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 102105 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=102105&action=review > > > Source/WebKit/efl/ewk/ewk_frame.h:153 > > EWK_TOUCH_POINT_MOVED, > > Is it better to sort by alphabetic order ? No, This patch is to keep same order between WebCore's enum values and WebKit's enum values. If they are different, AssertMatchingEnums will complain it in compile time.
Gyuyoung Kim
Comment 4 2011-07-27 02:28:52 PDT
OK, LGTM.
Ryuan Choi
Comment 5 2011-07-27 04:49:21 PDT
Created attachment 102125 [details] typo_fixed
Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)
Comment 6 2011-07-27 06:41:49 PDT
> Source/WebKit/efl/WebCoreSupport/AssertMatchingEnums.cpp:23 > + Isn't it better to explicitly include <wtf/Assertions.h> here? > Source/WebKit/efl/WebCoreSupport/AssertMatchingEnums.cpp:33 > + COMPILE_ASSERT(int(webkit_name) == int(WebCore::webcore_name), mismatching_enums) I prefer a C++ cast here. > Source/WebKit/efl/ewk/ewk_frame.h:147 > } Ewk_Touch_Event_Type; It's probably a good idea to add a comment here mentioning that the order of the items should match the order of the equivalent structure in WebCore. > Source/WebKit/efl/ewk/ewk_frame.h:157 > } Ewk_Touch_Point_Type; Ditto.
Ryuan Choi
Comment 7 2011-07-27 18:59:55 PDT
Ryuan Choi
Comment 8 2011-07-27 19:03:36 PDT
(In reply to comment #6) > > Source/WebKit/efl/WebCoreSupport/AssertMatchingEnums.cpp:23 > > + > > Isn't it better to explicitly include <wtf/Assertions.h> here? > Done. > > Source/WebKit/efl/WebCoreSupport/AssertMatchingEnums.cpp:33 > > + COMPILE_ASSERT(int(webkit_name) == int(WebCore::webcore_name), mismatching_enums) > > I prefer a C++ cast here. > Done. > > Source/WebKit/efl/ewk/ewk_frame.h:147 > > } Ewk_Touch_Event_Type; > > It's probably a good idea to add a comment here mentioning that the order of the items should match the order of the equivalent structure in WebCore. > > > Source/WebKit/efl/ewk/ewk_frame.h:157 > > } Ewk_Touch_Point_Type; > > Ditto. I'm not sure. I think that this comment make developers confused.
Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)
Comment 9 2011-07-28 05:37:30 PDT
> > > Source/WebKit/efl/ewk/ewk_frame.h:147 > > > } Ewk_Touch_Event_Type; > > > > It's probably a good idea to add a comment here mentioning that the order of the items should match the order of the equivalent structure in WebCore. > > > > > Source/WebKit/efl/ewk/ewk_frame.h:157 > > > } Ewk_Touch_Point_Type; > > > > Ditto. > > I'm not sure. > I think that this comment make developers confused. Coming to think of it again, the compilation error that will happen if the enum is changed should be enough indeed. r+ from my side.
Ryuan Choi
Comment 10 2011-07-29 05:25:32 PDT
Ryuan Choi
Comment 11 2011-07-29 05:26:29 PDT
Comment on attachment 102349 [details] Patch Sorry, It's mistake.
Ryuan Choi
Comment 12 2011-11-06 20:36:46 PST
Ryuan Choi
Comment 13 2011-11-06 20:37:44 PST
(In reply to comment #12) > Created an attachment (id=113821) [details] > Patch Rebased and remove more switch statements which is recently added.
Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)
Comment 14 2011-12-06 07:37:50 PST
LGTM :) Dunno if there are currently more enums which can benefit from this change, but it's up to you whether you want to do that in this patch or fix them later.
Ryuan Choi
Comment 15 2011-12-06 15:41:57 PST
(In reply to comment #14) > LGTM :) > > Dunno if there are currently more enums which can benefit from this change, but it's up to you whether you want to do that in this patch or fix them later. Thanks for the comment. I briefly searched ewk/ and this patch is still enough.
Filip Pizlo
Comment 16 2011-12-07 17:53:02 PST
Comment on attachment 113821 [details] Patch Looks good, r=me
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 17 2011-12-07 18:11:25 PST
Comment on attachment 113821 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 113821 Committed r102297: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/102297>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 18 2011-12-07 18:11:31 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.