RESOLVED FIXED 64985
hook in the rest of the bots to the dashboard now they run NRWT
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64985
Summary hook in the rest of the bots to the dashboard now they run NRWT
Ojan Vafai
Reported 2011-07-21 15:38:44 PDT
hook in the rest of the bots to the dashboard now they run NRWT
Attachments
Patch (1.65 KB, patch)
2011-07-21 15:39 PDT, Ojan Vafai
no flags
Patch (9.05 KB, patch)
2011-07-22 11:49 PDT, Ojan Vafai
abarth: review+
Ojan Vafai
Comment 1 2011-07-21 15:39:04 PDT
Ojan Vafai
Comment 2 2011-07-21 15:42:25 PDT
I'll commit this once the master has restarted and this all actually works. :)
Ojan Vafai
Comment 3 2011-07-22 11:49:42 PDT
Adam Barth
Comment 4 2011-07-22 11:52:48 PDT
Comment on attachment 101749 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=101749&action=review > Tools/TestResultServer/static-dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html:322 > -var PLATFORMS = ['SNOWLEOPARD', 'LEOPARD', 'XP', 'VISTA', 'WIN7', 'LUCID']; > +var PLATFORMS = ['SNOWLEOPARD', 'LEOPARD', 'XP', 'VISTA', 'WIN7', 'LUCID', 'APPLE_LEOPARD', 'APPLE_SNOWLEOPARD', 'APPLE_XP', 'APPLE_WIN7', 'GTK_LINUX', 'QT_LINUX']; Should LEOPARD be CHROMIUM_LEOPARD ? (etc) > Tools/TestResultServer/static-dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html:526 > +function nonChromiumPlatform(builderNameUpperCase) This doesn't seem like a function that should exist. > Tools/TestResultServer/static-dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html:542 > +function chromiumPlatform(builderNameUpperCase) Why does chromium get special treatment? It seems like Qt and Chromium would be similar in this regard.
Adam Barth
Comment 5 2011-07-22 11:58:44 PDT
Comment on attachment 101749 [details] Patch I'm marking this patch r+ because I feel like you're the owner of this code and you should set its direction. This isn't the approach I would take because it feels like adding "non-chromium" as a special case rather that moving all the "chromium stuff" into chromium-specific names. From a project-wide point of view, Chromium is a special case of WebKit, which is why we have things like chromium-mac and we should rename LayoutTests/platform/mac to LayoutTests/platform/apple-mac. That's a somewhat larger project than what you're trying to accomplish here, and I can understand the value of getting something working as a base to start iterating from.
Ojan Vafai
Comment 6 2011-07-22 12:01:22 PDT
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=101749&action=review >> Tools/TestResultServer/static-dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html:322 >> +var PLATFORMS = ['SNOWLEOPARD', 'LEOPARD', 'XP', 'VISTA', 'WIN7', 'LUCID', 'APPLE_LEOPARD', 'APPLE_SNOWLEOPARD', 'APPLE_XP', 'APPLE_WIN7', 'GTK_LINUX', 'QT_LINUX']; > > Should LEOPARD be CHROMIUM_LEOPARD ? (etc) These are supposed to match whatever's in the test_expectations file. I have a FIXME in the test to figure out what we're doing with platform names in the test_expectations files. Maybe I should put a FIXME here as well? >> Tools/TestResultServer/static-dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html:542 >> +function chromiumPlatform(builderNameUpperCase) > > Why does chromium get special treatment? It seems like Qt and Chromium would be similar in this regard. Chromium builders use a different naming convention than the non-chromium builders. These functions just map from builder name to platform. We could simplify this code by changing builder name conventions, but I'm not sure that's worth it.
Ojan Vafai
Comment 7 2011-07-22 12:16:39 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.