WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
64358
TestFailures page thinks all tests passed in
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Windows%207%20Release%20(Tests)/builds/14672
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64358
Summary
TestFailures page thinks all tests passed in http://build.webkit.org/builders...
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Reported
2011-07-12 07:13:15 PDT
TestFailures page thinks all tests passed in
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Windows%207%20Release%20(Tests)/builds/14672
Attachments
Patch
(7.59 KB, patch)
2011-07-12 07:14 PDT
,
Adam Roben (:aroben)
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 1
2011-07-12 07:14:18 PDT
Created
attachment 100481
[details]
Patch
Daniel Bates
Comment 2
2011-07-12 10:08:29 PDT
Comment on
attachment 100481
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=100481&action=review
> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/build.webkit.org-config/public_html/TestFailures/Builder.js:156 > + result.failureCount = -1;
I take it that you've ensured that the callsites can handle failureCount = -1. Briefly looking through the code this appears to be true.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 3
2011-07-12 10:51:13 PDT
Comment on
attachment 100481
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 100481 Committed
r90824
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/90824
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 4
2011-07-12 10:51:18 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 5
2011-07-12 11:03:37 PDT
Comment on
attachment 100481
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=100481&action=review
>> Tools/BuildSlaveSupport/build.webkit.org-config/public_html/TestFailures/Builder.js:156 >> + result.failureCount = -1; > > I take it that you've ensured that the callsites can handle failureCount = -1. Briefly looking through the code this appears to be true.
Yes. It was already possible for this function to return -1 in some cases, so callers have been expecting it for a while.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug