RESOLVED WONTFIX64211
Rebaseline following r90646
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64211
Summary Rebaseline following r90646
David Reveman
Reported 2011-07-08 15:54:49 PDT
Rebaseline following r90646
Attachments
Rebaseline following r90646 (deleted)
2011-07-08 16:04 PDT, David Reveman
no flags
Update pixel expectations for r90646 (deleted)
2011-07-11 11:30 PDT, David Reveman
jamesr: review-
David Reveman
Comment 1 2011-07-08 16:04:05 PDT
Created attachment 100178 [details] Rebaseline following r90646 Attempt to rebaseline chromium GPU tests following layer anti-aliasing changes.
David Reveman
Comment 2 2011-07-08 16:17:01 PDT
This first attempt only includes tests that have previously expected results. The rebaseline script failed to find previous results for most tests on Windows. Is this expected?
David Reveman
Comment 3 2011-07-11 11:30:36 PDT
Created attachment 100335 [details] Update pixel expectations for r90646
James Robinson
Comment 4 2011-07-11 13:01:48 PDT
Comment on attachment 100335 [details] Update pixel expectations for r90646 This patch is mangled, see LayoutTests/platform/chromium-gpu-linux/compositing/reflections/reflection-positioning-expected.png. Additionally our tools don't really support 6mb+ patches. It'll probably be easier for me to just rebaseline
David Reveman
Comment 5 2011-07-11 13:33:51 PDT
(In reply to comment #4) > (From update of attachment 100335 [details]) > This patch is mangled, see LayoutTests/platform/chromium-gpu-linux/compositing/reflections/reflection-positioning-expected.png. Additionally our tools don't really support 6mb+ patches. It'll probably be easier for me to just rebaseline It was generated with git-format-patch. Guess the tools doesn't support that. Is there a way to generate proper webkit patches with binary file changes from a git checkout? Let me know if you want me to do a svn checkout and generate a patch for the same change with svn-create-patch.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.