We need this to allow disabling/enabling the API.
We can add an Settings flag at the same time.
Created attachment 106223 [details] Cook on bots.
Comment on attachment 106223 [details] Cook on bots. Attachment 106223 [details] did not pass mac-ews (mac): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/9583813
Comment on attachment 106223 [details] Cook on bots. Attachment 106223 [details] did not pass gtk-ews (gtk): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/9589147
Created attachment 106287 [details] Cook more.
Comment on attachment 106287 [details] Cook more. Attachment 106287 [details] did not pass gtk-ews (gtk): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/9591367
Created attachment 106486 [details] Bake, dammit.
Created attachment 106594 [details] Baka-baka-baka.
Comment on attachment 106594 [details] Baka-baka-baka. Attachment 106594 [details] did not pass qt-ews (qt): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/9602646
Comment on attachment 106594 [details] Baka-baka-baka. Attachment 106594 [details] did not pass gtk-ews (gtk): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/9602649
Created attachment 106617 [details] Bake moar.
Shouldn't this better be 2 patches - one just for the flag, and one for the ShadowRoot JS stuff + tests?
(In reply to comment #12) > Shouldn't this better be 2 patches - one just for the flag, and one for the ShadowRoot JS stuff + tests? Yup.
We're not going to have a flag like this. Rather, probably a set of flags.