RESOLVED FIXED Bug 63313
The return value of SharedBuffer::createWithContentsOfFile must have valid m_size. 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63313
Summary The return value of SharedBuffer::createWithContentsOfFile must have valid m_...
Kim, kyusun
Reported 2011-06-23 22:48:57 PDT
SharedBufferPOSIX.cpp - SharedBuffer::m_size has to be set
Attachments
Patch (1.38 KB, patch)
2011-06-23 22:54 PDT, Kim, kyusun 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (1.77 KB, patch)
2011-07-07 02:23 PDT, Kim, kyusun 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Kim, kyusun
Comment 1 2011-06-23 22:54:03 PDT
Created attachment 98460 [details] Patch
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 2 2011-07-05 17:57:35 PDT
Comment on attachment 98460 [details] Patch How do we test this? Is there a public function we should call instead of setting m_size directly?
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 3 2011-07-05 18:01:24 PDT
Comment on attachment 98460 [details] Patch In general this looks fine though.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 4 2011-07-05 18:01:50 PDT
How did you detect that this was broken?
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 5 2011-07-05 18:04:51 PDT
CCing anders who originally created the SharedBuffer class. It's strange to me that m_size is not used by most ports.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 6 2011-07-05 18:06:10 PDT
Comment on attachment 98460 [details] Patch Clearing cq+. It seems to me it would be better for this code to read into a Vector and then create the SharedBuffer from the Vector. SharedBuffer doesn't seem to be designed to be read into directly, it's meant to wrap other data storage mechanisms. Since this POSIX implementation doesn't have any "native" data storage, seems we should use Vector.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 7 2011-07-05 18:07:39 PDT
We already have a adoptVector(Vector) which gets all this right, including setting m_size. I worry that there are other things that might be missing from this implementation in the future. re-using the adoptVector(Vector) method may be more future-proof.
Kim, kyusun
Comment 8 2011-07-05 22:13:39 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 98460 [details]) > How do we test this? Currently, there is no port in upstream that uses this file. So, we cannot test it for now. > Is there a public function we should call instead of setting m_size directly? There is no setter for m_size.
Kim, kyusun
Comment 9 2011-07-05 22:14:13 PDT
(In reply to comment #4) > How did you detect that this was broken? When I used the linux port that is mentioned in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39348#c6, I found this bug.
Kim, kyusun
Comment 10 2011-07-05 22:16:13 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > We already have a adoptVector(Vector) which gets all this right, including setting m_size. I worry that there are other things that might be missing from this implementation in the future. re-using the adoptVector(Vector) method may be more future-proof. Ok. After modifying it, I'll submit new patch.
Kim, kyusun
Comment 11 2011-07-07 02:23:56 PDT
Created attachment 99961 [details] Patch
Kim, kyusun
Comment 12 2011-07-07 02:42:21 PDT
Changed to use adoptVector(Vector).
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 13 2011-07-07 10:18:10 PDT
Comment on attachment 99961 [details] Patch Nice!
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 14 2011-07-07 10:29:32 PDT
Comment on attachment 99961 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 99961 Committed r90574: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/90574>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 15 2011-07-07 10:29:37 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.