RESOLVED WORKSFORME62520
Specificity:not(el) A type selector within negation should have a specificity of 0:1:0 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62520
Summary A type selector within negation should have a specificity of 0:1:0
Alan Gresley
Reported 2011-06-12 15:59:54 PDT
Always reproduce-able. Simple setup. <!doctype html> <style type="text/css"> body {color: white;} body :not([foo]) {background: green;} body :not(bar) {background: red;} </style> <p>This paragraph should have a green background.</div> The paragraph should have a green background since :not([foo]) has a specificity of 0:1:1 where :not(foo) should have a specificity of 0:0:1.
Attachments
Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Alan Gresley
Comment 1 2011-06-12 23:16:04 PDT
(In reply to comment #0) > Always reproduce-able. Simple setup. > > <!doctype html> > > <style type="text/css"> > body {color: white;} > body :not([foo]) {background: green;} > body :not(bar) {background: red;} > </style> > > <p>This paragraph should have a green background.</div> > > The paragraph should have a green background since :not([foo]) has a specificity of 0:1:1 where :not(foo) should have a specificity of 0:0:1. :not([foo]) has a specificity of 0:1:0.
Alice Boxhall
Comment 2 2011-06-15 20:59:51 PDT
This seems to work in WebKit Nightly r88920 using http://jsfiddle.net/vfWFN/ Could you confirm whether this is still an issue for you in WebKit Nightly?
Alan Gresley
Comment 3 2011-06-16 01:47:06 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > This seems to work in WebKit Nightly r88920 using http://jsfiddle.net/vfWFN/ > > Could you confirm whether this is still an issue for you in WebKit Nightly? I can confirm that the issue with specificity has be fixed. Thank you.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.