NEW 58990
REGRESSION (r84306-r84311?): editing/undo/undo-iframe-location-change.html sometimes fails on SnowLeopard Intel Release (WebKit2 Tests)
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58990
Summary REGRESSION (r84306-r84311?): editing/undo/undo-iframe-location-change.html so...
Jessie Berlin
Reported 2011-04-20 07:27:50 PDT
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/84307 http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(WebKit2%20Tests)/r84306%20(10865)/results.html http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(WebKit2%20Tests)/r84311%20(10866)/results.html In addition, I am not really sure why the pixel test results for compositing/iframes/invisible-iframe.html and compositing/iframes/invisible-nested-iframe-hide.html are in the cross-platform directory. I would expect those tests to be failing when run with -p on a bunch of platforms.
Attachments
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 1 2011-04-20 08:55:17 PDT
Enrica and I investigated the failure of editing/undo/undo-iframe-location-change.html but it passes locally.
Jessie Berlin
Comment 2 2011-04-22 08:08:03 PDT
(In reply to comment #1) > Enrica and I investigated the failure of editing/undo/undo-iframe-location-change.html but it passes locally. Just to be sure, you tested with WK2? I ask because it is failing pretty consistently on the SL WK2 bots. Did you get a chance to look into the compositing/iframes/invisible-nested-iframe-show.html failures?
Enrica Casucci
Comment 3 2011-04-22 11:58:35 PDT
I just tested one more time with r84650 on my SnowLeopard machine and I see no failures in the editing tests.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 4 2011-04-22 12:36:24 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Enrica and I investigated the failure of editing/undo/undo-iframe-location-change.html but it passes locally. > > Just to be sure, you tested with WK2? I ask because it is failing pretty consistently on the SL WK2 bots. Yes. > Did you get a chance to look into the compositing/iframes/invisible-nested-iframe-show.html failures? No.
Jessie Berlin
Comment 5 2011-04-25 09:40:42 PDT
Because these are keeping the SL WK2 bots red, I am going to commit failing expected results soon.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 6 2011-04-25 10:26:31 PDT
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/84783 might have broken Chromium Win Release
Jessie Berlin
Comment 7 2011-04-25 14:19:45 PDT
Now I am really confused. As soon as I committed the expected failing results in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/84783, the editing test started passing on the bots (which is now making the bots red again because it is expecting failure). Any ideas as to what happened here?
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 8 2011-04-30 04:36:30 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > Now I am really confused. As soon as I committed the expected failing results in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/84783, the editing test started passing on the bots (which is now making the bots red again because it is expecting failure). > > Any ideas as to what happened here? I guess the bots must have gone back to their previous behavior, because they aren't red anymore.
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 9 2011-04-30 04:41:06 PDT
These two tests seem unlikely to be failing for the same reason. I split out compositing/iframes/invisible-nested-iframe-show.html into a new bug: bug 59864.
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 10 2011-04-30 04:42:26 PDT
(In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Now I am really confused. As soon as I committed the expected failing results in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/84783, the editing test started passing on the bots (which is now making the bots red again because it is expecting failure). > > > > Any ideas as to what happened here? > > I guess the bots must have gone back to their previous behavior, because they aren't red anymore. My mistake, this test is indeed failing on the bots (because it's producing successful results, but we have failure results checked in). I guess we should just remove the expected failure results and see if it starts failing again.
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 12 2011-04-30 05:03:07 PDT
Added to the mac-wk2 Skipped file in r85397.
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 13 2011-04-30 05:07:05 PDT
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 14 2011-04-30 09:49:21 PDT
There might be some race condition going on here. Maybe when a page navigates in WebProcess, undo stack isn't cleared immediately in UIProcess.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 15 2011-04-30 09:50:29 PDT
See also bug 20366.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.