RESOLVED FIXED Bug 58692
old-run-webkit-tests: save the list of tests actually run to a file
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58692
Summary old-run-webkit-tests: save the list of tests actually run to a file
Dirk Pranke
Reported 2011-04-15 14:03:11 PDT
old-run-webkit-tests: save the list of tests actually run to a file
Attachments
Patch (1.66 KB, patch)
2011-04-15 14:04 PDT, Dirk Pranke
no flags
Dirk Pranke
Comment 1 2011-04-15 14:04:41 PDT
Dirk Pranke
Comment 2 2011-04-15 14:08:16 PDT
I don't actually care that much whether we land this or not, I'm just posting it in case other people might find it useful.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 3 2011-04-15 14:09:18 PDT
Comment on attachment 89849 [details] Patch I think this could be quite useful, honestly. Does NRWT do similar?
Dirk Pranke
Comment 4 2011-04-15 15:08:28 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 89849 [details]) > I think this could be quite useful, honestly. Does NRWT do similar? Yes, NRWT saves a list per-worker.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 5 2011-04-15 20:59:56 PDT
Comment on attachment 89849 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 89849 Committed r84076: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/84076>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 6 2011-04-15 21:00:00 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 7 2011-04-20 06:01:56 PDT
I think it is a useful feature for debugging, but we can get similar list on stdout with -v option. I have two minor problems with it: - ~ 3Mb sized list file for every build is hard disk killer on buildbot masters It would be better to make this feature optional,or upload gzipped list.(~130Kb) - absolute path: Why do we use absolute paths in this list? I think relative paths to LayoutTests directory is more than enough. Reopen to discuss about my proposed changes.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 8 2011-04-20 12:10:15 PDT
I like both of those suggestions. Just putting it behind a flag seems reasonable.
Ojan Vafai
Comment 9 2011-04-20 12:16:50 PDT
(In reply to comment #8) > I like both of those suggestions. Just putting it behind a flag seems reasonable. Noooo. We have way too many flags already. There's no reason to store the absolute path. I expect storing relative paths will be enough to make this file reasonably sized. If not that, writing out the zipped file is surely sufficient.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 10 2011-04-20 13:10:11 PDT
I have no objection to either flags or shorter paths. I wouldn't bother gzipping the list. Or, feel free to revert it, even. We've made it this long without it :)
Dirk Pranke
Comment 11 2011-05-31 18:35:02 PDT
Csaba, do you have an opinion on whether just relative paths but not a gzipped list would be sufficient?
Dirk Pranke
Comment 12 2011-06-15 13:27:53 PDT
I'm going to close this due to lack of comments and post a separate patch that shortens the list to relative paths and call it a day. See bug 62751 for the patch.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.