WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 58692
old-run-webkit-tests: save the list of tests actually run to a file
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58692
Summary
old-run-webkit-tests: save the list of tests actually run to a file
Dirk Pranke
Reported
2011-04-15 14:03:11 PDT
old-run-webkit-tests: save the list of tests actually run to a file
Attachments
Patch
(1.66 KB, patch)
2011-04-15 14:04 PDT
,
Dirk Pranke
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 1
2011-04-15 14:04:41 PDT
Created
attachment 89849
[details]
Patch
Dirk Pranke
Comment 2
2011-04-15 14:08:16 PDT
I don't actually care that much whether we land this or not, I'm just posting it in case other people might find it useful.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 3
2011-04-15 14:09:18 PDT
Comment on
attachment 89849
[details]
Patch I think this could be quite useful, honestly. Does NRWT do similar?
Dirk Pranke
Comment 4
2011-04-15 15:08:28 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (From update of
attachment 89849
[details]
) > I think this could be quite useful, honestly. Does NRWT do similar?
Yes, NRWT saves a list per-worker.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 5
2011-04-15 20:59:56 PDT
Comment on
attachment 89849
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 89849 Committed
r84076
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/84076
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 6
2011-04-15 21:00:00 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 7
2011-04-20 06:01:56 PDT
I think it is a useful feature for debugging, but we can get similar list on stdout with -v option. I have two minor problems with it: - ~ 3Mb sized list file for every build is hard disk killer on buildbot masters It would be better to make this feature optional,or upload gzipped list.(~130Kb) - absolute path: Why do we use absolute paths in this list? I think relative paths to LayoutTests directory is more than enough. Reopen to discuss about my proposed changes.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 8
2011-04-20 12:10:15 PDT
I like both of those suggestions. Just putting it behind a flag seems reasonable.
Ojan Vafai
Comment 9
2011-04-20 12:16:50 PDT
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> I like both of those suggestions. Just putting it behind a flag seems reasonable.
Noooo. We have way too many flags already. There's no reason to store the absolute path. I expect storing relative paths will be enough to make this file reasonably sized. If not that, writing out the zipped file is surely sufficient.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 10
2011-04-20 13:10:11 PDT
I have no objection to either flags or shorter paths. I wouldn't bother gzipping the list. Or, feel free to revert it, even. We've made it this long without it :)
Dirk Pranke
Comment 11
2011-05-31 18:35:02 PDT
Csaba, do you have an opinion on whether just relative paths but not a gzipped list would be sufficient?
Dirk Pranke
Comment 12
2011-06-15 13:27:53 PDT
I'm going to close this due to lack of comments and post a separate patch that shortens the list to relative paths and call it a day. See
bug 62751
for the patch.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug