WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
56994
:not should accept "a comma-separated list of compound selectors"
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56994
Summary
:not should accept "a comma-separated list of compound selectors"
Ojan Vafai
Reported
2011-03-23 21:14:12 PDT
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#negation
This does mean we'll fail
http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/ietestcenter/css3/selectors/notSelectorSequence.htm
, but I think it's better that we match the better behavior of the Selectors 4 spec. I'll try and find someone at Microsoft to see if they're willing to change the test.
Attachments
Patch
(29.17 KB, patch)
2011-03-25 00:27 PDT
,
Ojan Vafai
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Ojan Vafai
Comment 1
2011-03-25 00:27:01 PDT
Created
attachment 86903
[details]
Patch
Ojan Vafai
Comment 2
2011-03-25 00:27:50 PDT
I've emailed Resig and MS to see if they're willing to change their tests to match the new spec.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 3
2011-05-23 14:50:24 PDT
Any update? It's been about a month.
Adam Barth
Comment 4
2011-10-14 17:22:00 PDT
Comment on
attachment 86903
[details]
Patch Please re-nominate when you hear back from John.
Ojan Vafai
Comment 5
2012-01-05 17:01:19 PST
The Resig test suite appears to also live at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/
, which covers selectors levels 2.1 and 3. And it's not clear who maintains it. This is changed in
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/
, which does not have a test suite yet. Is anyone opposed to me committing this without getting this test suite updated since it's testing selectors 3 and the API change this implements is part of selectors 4 given that I can't get responses from Resig or MS?
Benjamin Poulain
Comment 6
2014-11-01 10:42:12 PDT
WebKit supports :not() of Level 4.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug