WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
56505
Add a test for
r81266
and fix HTML Editing for fallback contents in object element
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56505
Summary
Add a test for r81266 and fix HTML Editing for fallback contents in object el...
Ryosuke Niwa
Reported
2011-03-16 16:59:38 PDT
As a regression fix,
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/81266
partially fixed a bug in canHaveChildrenForEditing that WebKit used to ignore contents inside hr and datagrid elements even if those elements had child nodes. We should also fix a bug that it returns false for object element even when it uses fallback content.
Attachments
56505
(4.92 KB, patch)
2011-03-16 17:42 PDT
,
Ryosuke Niwa
ojan
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 1
2011-03-16 17:42:25 PDT
Created
attachment 86010
[details]
56505
Ojan Vafai
Comment 2
2011-03-16 20:36:42 PDT
Comment on
attachment 86010
[details]
56505 View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=86010&action=review
Looks like only the last case's "world" is bolded. I assuem that's a bug in the test case.
> LayoutTests/editing/editability/ignored-content.html:34 > +for (var i = 0; i < (text.length + 1) * test.childNodes.length - 1; i++) > + window.getSelection().modify('extend', 'forward', 'character');
for loops should always have curly braces.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 3
2011-03-16 22:27:37 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> (From update of
attachment 86010
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=86010&action=review
> > Looks like only the last case's "world" is bolded. I assuem that's a bug in the test case.
I don't quite get what you mean by only the last case is bolded. As far as I can see in the following expected result, "world" is a child of b element in each of the tree cases:
> LayoutTests/editing/editability/ignored-content-expected.txt:18 > +| <hr> > +| "hello " > +| <b> <- here > +| "world" > +| " WebKit" > +| <datagrid> > +| "hello " > +| <b> <- here > +| "world" > +| " WebKit" > +| <object> > +| "hello " > +| <b> <- here > +| "<#selection-anchor>world<#selection-focus>" > +| " WebKit"
>> LayoutTests/editing/editability/ignored-content.html:34 >> + window.getSelection().modify('extend', 'forward', 'character'); > > for loops should always have curly braces.
I don't think that's right. See the 3rd example in "Spacing" section of
http://www.webkit.org/coding/coding-style.html
. Also see:
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WebCore/dom/Node.cpp#L827
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WebCore/dom/Node.cpp#L992
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WebCore/dom/Node.cpp#L1003
Ojan Vafai
Comment 4
2011-03-18 00:10:30 PDT
Comment on
attachment 86010
[details]
56505 View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=86010&action=review
Sorry, I misread the test case and apparently I'm just wrong about for loops.
> Source/WebCore/editing/htmlediting.cpp:83 > + && (!node->hasTagName(objectTag) || static_cast<const HTMLObjectElement*>(node)->useFallbackContent())
How can you know that this will be an HTMLObjectElement?
Ojan Vafai
Comment 5
2011-03-18 00:11:08 PDT
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (From update of
attachment 86010
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=86010&action=review
> > Sorry, I misread the test case and apparently I'm just wrong about for loops. > > > Source/WebCore/editing/htmlediting.cpp:83 > > + && (!node->hasTagName(objectTag) || static_cast<const HTMLObjectElement*>(node)->useFallbackContent()) > > How can you know that this will be an HTMLObjectElement?
Ugh. Ignore me. I can't read today.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 6
2011-03-18 17:15:39 PDT
Committed
r81537
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/81537
>
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 7
2011-03-18 17:16:08 PDT
Thanks for the review, Ojan.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug