WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 55087
webkitpy.layout_tests.layout_package.manager_worker_broker_unittest.FunctionTests.test_get__processes sometimes fails on Windows
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
Summary
webkitpy.layout_tests.layout_package.manager_worker_broker_unittest.FunctionT...
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Reported
2011-02-23 14:50:19 PST
webkitpy.layout_tests.layout_package.manager_worker_broker_unittest.FunctionTests.test_get__processes is sometimes failing on Windows. For example: Did not fail:
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Windows%207%20Release%20%28Tests%29/builds/9673
Did fail:
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Windows%207%20Release%20%28Tests%29/builds/9679
So far I've only seen it fail on apple-windows-5, which is running Python 2.6.5. I believe apple-windows-6 is running Python 2.5.x.
Attachments
Patch
(1.64 KB, patch)
2011-02-28 16:58 PST
,
Dirk Pranke
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 1
2011-02-23 17:40:44 PST
Hm. That test is showing python-level failures in the "multiprocessing" module, which is only available under Python 2.6. So that test won't run (or fail) under 2.5. We'll have to watch it to see how flaky it is ...
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 2
2011-02-24 05:03:01 PST
Another failure:
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Windows%207%20Release%20%28Tests%29/builds/9691/steps/webkitpy-test/logs/stdio
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 3
2011-02-24 07:33:29 PST
More failures:
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Windows%207%20Release%20%28Tests%29/builds/9662
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Windows%207%20Release%20%28Tests%29/builds/9671
So it failed 4 times from build 9662 to build 9691, inclusive. That's once every 7 builds or so.
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 4
2011-02-27 10:18:00 PST
<
rdar://problem/9059908
>
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 5
2011-02-28 08:07:19 PST
We've been seeing cases where lots of python processes are left around on the bots. I wonder if this bug is the/a cause of that?
Dirk Pranke
Comment 6
2011-02-28 13:08:36 PST
(In reply to
comment #5
)
> We've been seeing cases where lots of python processes are left around on the bots. I wonder if this bug is the/a cause of that?
It's quite possible. When I briefly had the multiprocessing module enabled for new-run-webkit-tests, we also seemed to see a bunch of processes lying around. I think I'll disable this test for now until I can do some more testing on Windows and see if there are bugs I can reproduce/triage/fix.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 7
2011-02-28 16:25:45 PST
Assigning to myself and skipping for now until I can triage it further.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 8
2011-02-28 16:58:49 PST
Created
attachment 84152
[details]
Patch
Dirk Pranke
Comment 9
2011-02-28 18:34:20 PST
I don't like skipping tests ... anyone have any ideas before I disable it?
Adam Roben (:aroben)
Comment 10
2011-03-01 05:55:49 PST
Skipped the test on Windows to get the bots green Committed
r79993
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/79993
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 11
2011-03-01 08:39:16 PST
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/79993
might have broken GTK Linux 32-bit Debug
Dirk Pranke
Comment 12
2011-03-02 18:17:54 PST
clearing ownership now that I've disabled the bug, in the off chance that someone else wants to take this.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 13
2011-06-18 13:43:00 PDT
Attachment 84152
[details]
was posted by a committer and has review+, assigning to Dirk Pranke for commit.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 14
2011-06-20 12:19:36 PDT
It looks like aroben landed this in
r79993
. Closing.
Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)
Comment 15
2012-05-14 11:13:51 PDT
Has this been further investigated? I was looking at eliminating more uses of sys.platform and came across this one.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 16
2012-05-14 12:13:27 PDT
Nope, I haven't had a chance to look into it further, and it's not super-high on my priority list.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug