WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
52681
[chromium] Fix compositor repaints for offscreen fixed elements
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681
Summary
[chromium] Fix compositor repaints for offscreen fixed elements
Adrienne Walker
Reported
2011-01-18 16:15:26 PST
[chromium] Fix compositor repaints for offscreen fixed elements
Attachments
Patch
(3.33 KB, patch)
2011-01-20 14:14 PST
,
Adrienne Walker
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Manual test
(1.42 KB, text/html)
2011-01-20 14:55 PST
,
Adrienne Walker
no flags
Details
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Adrienne Walker
Comment 1
2011-01-20 14:14:50 PST
Created
attachment 79650
[details]
Patch
Adrienne Walker
Comment 2
2011-01-20 14:16:48 PST
This bug was causing weird repainting issues on youtube when viewing hardware accelerated video. See:
http://crbug.com/69692
James Robinson
Comment 3
2011-01-20 14:24:04 PST
Comment on
attachment 79650
[details]
Patch Can we at least add a test somewhere that would demonstrate the issue, even if it doesn't show the issue in our current test harness?
Adrienne Walker
Comment 4
2011-01-20 14:27:05 PST
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (From update of
attachment 79650
[details]
) > Can we at least add a test somewhere that would demonstrate the issue, even if it doesn't show the issue in our current test harness?
Sure. I'll admit that I'm reluctant to add a manual test that will almost certainly gather copious amounts of dust, but if you tell me where it should go, I'd be glad to add it to this patch.
Vangelis Kokkevis
Comment 5
2011-01-20 14:29:06 PST
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (In reply to
comment #3
) > > (From update of
attachment 79650
[details]
[details]) > > Can we at least add a test somewhere that would demonstrate the issue, even if it doesn't show the issue in our current test harness? > > Sure. I'll admit that I'm reluctant to add a manual test that will almost certainly gather copious amounts of dust, but if you tell me where it should go, I'd be glad to add it to this patch.
Is it not possible to have a pixel test for it and demonstrate it by scrolling the page in JS?
James Robinson
Comment 6
2011-01-20 14:40:10 PST
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (In reply to
comment #3
) > > (From update of
attachment 79650
[details]
[details]) > > Can we at least add a test somewhere that would demonstrate the issue, even if it doesn't show the issue in our current test harness? > > Sure. I'll admit that I'm reluctant to add a manual test that will almost certainly gather copious amounts of dust, but if you tell me where it should go, I'd be glad to add it to this patch.
What does the manual test look like? It's probably possible to coerce it into something that we can run in DRT (although it may be tricksy).
Adrienne Walker
Comment 7
2011-01-20 14:50:02 PST
(In reply to
comment #5
)
> Is it not possible to have a pixel test for it and demonstrate it by scrolling the page in JS?
I have a page that automatically scrolls and demonstrates this bug in the browser. I've spent a good bit of time unsuccessfully trying to make it work in the test harness. After some information from jamesr, I verified that the FrameView::scrollContentsFastPath code path that I modified doesn't get called in DumpRenderTree. It seems to use FrameView::scrollContentsSlowPath, which always works because everything is invalidated. So, this bug doesn't get triggered when using DumpRenderTree at this point. I can file a bug about improving our test coverage, but I'd prefer to not shave that yak in this patch.
Adrienne Walker
Comment 8
2011-01-20 14:55:12 PST
Created
attachment 79654
[details]
Manual test I've attached the manual test I created.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 9
2011-01-21 03:06:25 PST
cmarrin likes compositor bugs. :)
James Robinson
Comment 10
2011-01-21 09:28:31 PST
(In reply to
comment #9
)
> cmarrin likes compositor bugs. :)
This is a chromium compositor bug.
James Robinson
Comment 11
2011-01-21 13:44:33 PST
Comment on
attachment 79650
[details]
Patch R=me. Please consider scripting that manual test and adding it to compositing/, even though it doesn't fail without this patch in chromium today. At some point in the future the test code will get close enough to the real code for that test to be a real regression test.
Adrienne Walker
Comment 12
2011-01-21 13:58:34 PST
Thanks for the review. (In reply to
comment #11
)
> (From update of
attachment 79650
[details]
) > R=me. Please consider scripting that manual test and adding it to compositing/, even though it doesn't fail without this patch in chromium today. At some point in the future the test code will get close enough to the real code for that test to be a real regression test.
Forgive me if I'm reluctant to add a test that doesn't actually test this regression. Each additional test is a burden and this has no immediate benefit. The bug tracker will keep this file around until we need it. Also, if this issue ever regresses, we can reprioritize changing how we scroll when testing.
James Robinson
Comment 13
2011-01-21 14:38:11 PST
OK, just promise not to break it :)
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 14
2011-01-22 02:00:21 PST
Comment on
attachment 79650
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 79650 Committed
r76437
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/76437
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 15
2011-01-22 02:00:27 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug