RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 49726 49913
CSS box shadow with percent radius should compute radius based on shadow's own width 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49913
Summary CSS box shadow with percent radius should compute radius based on shadow's ow...
Andreas Kling
Reported 2010-11-22 09:06:55 PST
A cursory glance points at RenderBoxModelObject::paintBoxShadow() which uses the values from RenderStyle::getBorderRadiiForRect() for the shadow as well. If the border-radius is specified in percent, those values should be relative to the shadow's size (with spread taken into account), not the element casting the shadow. Screenshots from WebKit and Firefox4 coming..
Attachments
Simple page illustrating the problem (661 bytes, text/html)
2010-11-22 09:07 PST, Andreas Kling 		no flags
Details
WebKit's rendering of test page (12.75 KB, image/png)
2010-11-22 09:08 PST, Andreas Kling 		no flags
Details
Firefox4's rendering of test page (20.18 KB, image/png)
2010-11-22 09:08 PST, Andreas Kling 		no flags
Details
repro with px. (1006 bytes, text/html)
2010-12-23 21:49 PST, Hajime Morrita 		no flags
Details
View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Andreas Kling
Comment 1 2010-11-22 09:07:47 PST
Created attachment 74559 [details] Simple page illustrating the problem
Andreas Kling
Comment 2 2010-11-22 09:08:20 PST
Created attachment 74560 [details] WebKit's rendering of test page
Andreas Kling
Comment 3 2010-11-22 09:08:59 PST
Created attachment 74561 [details] Firefox4's rendering of test page
Hajime Morrita
Comment 4 2010-12-23 21:49:08 PST
Created attachment 77400 [details] repro with px. This isn't limited for percentage value. other values are should be also scaled accordingly because box-radius is for "box", not shadow. Mozilla and Opera do scale.
Hajime Morrita
Comment 5 2010-12-23 22:15:45 PST
Ah, I realized that this is a dup of Bug 49726 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 49726 ***
Hajime Morrita
Comment 6 2011-01-19 23:23:32 PST
Bug 27417 and LayoutTests/fast/box-shadow/spread.html says this is intentional. But I don't think so. Any opinions?
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.