Used in combination with tiling and resizesToContents.
Created attachment 73592 [details] Patch
Attachment 73592 [details] did not build on qt: Build output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/5517080
Comment on attachment 73592 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=73592&action=review > WebKit/qt/Api/qwebpage.h:283 > + void informVisibleContentsRect(const QRect& rect) const; I don't like this name at all, can we find a better word than "inform"? setVisibleContentsRect? forceVisibleContentsRect? overrideVisibleContentsRect?
Created attachment 73595 [details] Patch You win!
Comment on attachment 73595 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=73595&action=review r=me, I'll land it for you (once the WebCore change is in) with fixed ChangeLog. > WebKit/qt/ChangeLog:9 > + (QWebPage::informVisibleContentsRect): Somebody forgot to regen the ChangeLog ;)
Attachment 73595 [details] did not build on qt: Build output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/5460099
Committed r71806: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/71806>
What about updating the symbian .def files with this new API? (I don't know or have the tools necessary to update the .def files)
Created attachment 78418 [details] Fix for def file for symbian winscw I updated .def file for symbian winscw build. ARM build looks ok.
Comment on attachment 78418 [details] Fix for def file for symbian winscw What does this ABSENT mean? The method was removed from the branch?
(In reply to comment #10) > (From update of attachment 78418 [details]) > What does this ABSENT mean? The method was removed from the branch? I mean ViewportConfiguration was renamed long ago, can't those lines be removed instead? just wondering...
Proposed patch looks good to me for 2.1 (and likely for 2.2); not for trunk obviously. r=me. Kenneth, ABSENT is a simple way to ensure that there are no holes in the ordinal numbers - otherwise one would have to reuse the ordinal numbers for new symbols, which could be confusing for clients.
OK, thanks for the explanation!