Bug 47152 - CSS 2.1 failure: at-charset* tests fail
Summary: CSS 2.1 failure: at-charset* tests fail
Status: RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Layout and Rendering (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: All All
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 47141
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2010-10-04 21:42 PDT by Simon Fraser (smfr)
Modified: 2022-07-27 17:54 PDT (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
at-charset-002.htm (850 bytes, text/html)
2010-10-04 21:42 PDT, Simon Fraser (smfr) 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Simon Fraser (smfr) 2010-10-04 21:42:25 PDT 
Created attachment 69747 [details]
at-charset-002.htm

The following fail:

html4/at-charset-002	fail
html4/at-charset-003	fail
html4/at-charset-004	fail
html4/at-charset-005	fail
html4/at-charset-006	fail
html4/at-charset-008	fail
html4/at-charset-010	fail
html4/at-charset-029	fail
html4/at-charset-030	fail
html4/at-charset-042	fail
html4/at-charset-043	fail
html4/at-charset-044	fail
html4/at-charset-045	fail
html4/at-charset-046	fail
html4/at-charset-047	fail
html4/at-charset-048	fail
html4/at-charset-056	fail
html4/at-charset-060	fail
html4/at-charset-utf16-be-001	fail
html4/at-charset-utf16-be-002	fail
html4/at-charset-utf16-le-001	fail
html4/at-charset-utf16-le-002	fail
Comment 1 Alexey Proskuryakov 2010-10-04 22:20:43 PDT 
Do we even support non-ASCII class names in WebKit?
Comment 2 Mathias Bynens 2011-04-04 07:11:22 PDT 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Do we even support non-ASCII class names in WebKit?

Yes, you do (as per the spec). Some examples here: http://mathiasbynens.be/demo/crazy-class
Comment 3 Alexey Proskuryakov 2011-04-04 09:12:03 PDT 
> http://mathiasbynens.be/demo/crazy-class

Cool, lots of green! We should probably land this as a regression test.
Comment 4 Mathias Bynens 2011-04-04 09:59:00 PDT 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Cool, lots of green! We should probably land this as a regression test.

Here’s the same test case for @id instead of @class: http://mathiasbynens.be/demo/html5-id

Please feel free to use any of these.
Comment 5 Robert Hogan 2011-09-13 07:44:02 PDT 
(In reply to comment #0)
> 
> html4/at-charset-002    fail
> html4/at-charset-003    fail
> html4/at-charset-004    fail
> html4/at-charset-005    fail
> html4/at-charset-006    fail
> html4/at-charset-008    fail
> html4/at-charset-010    fail

These all pass now.
Comment 6 Ahmad Saleem 2022-07-27 13:18:38 PDT 
Safari passes all test as can be seen from WPT:

https://wpt.fyi/results/css?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=at-charset

Can we mark this as "RESOLVED FIXED"? Thanks!
Comment 7 Brent Fulgham 2022-07-27 17:54:45 PDT 
(In reply to Ahmad Saleem from comment #6)
> Safari passes all test as can be seen from WPT:
> 
> https://wpt.fyi/results/css?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=at-
> charset
> 
> Can we mark this as "RESOLVED FIXED"? Thanks!

WPT is the gold standard. Let’s close! Thank you for testing!