WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of
bug 48127
Bug 46262
[Qt] [WebKit2] Workarounds for the flash plugin
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Summary
[Qt] [WebKit2] Workarounds for the flash plugin
Balazs Kelemen
Reported
2010-09-22 07:47:55 PDT
My plan is to organizing the static functions from PluginPackageQt.cpp into a class with static methods.
Attachments
proposed patch
(16.72 KB, patch)
2010-09-23 05:52 PDT
,
Balazs Kelemen
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 1
2010-09-23 05:07:30 PDT
As I went forward with the implementation I have decided to put the refactoring and the changes that needs to be done in WebKit2 in one patch. That is why I changed the bug title.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 2
2010-09-23 05:52:34 PDT
Created
attachment 68510
[details]
proposed patch
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 3
2010-09-23 05:55:53 PDT
Comment on
attachment 68510
[details]
proposed patch Maybe call the class FlashPluginQuirks ?
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 4
2010-09-24 05:57:42 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (From update of
attachment 68510
[details]
) > Maybe call the class FlashPluginQuirks ?
We use the term quirks in a different meaning: handling less stupid flavour of some plugins. FlashPluginHacks?
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 5
2010-09-24 06:01:32 PDT
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (In reply to
comment #3
) > > (From update of
attachment 68510
[details]
[details]) > > Maybe call the class FlashPluginQuirks ? > > We use the term quirks in a different meaning: handling less stupid flavour of some plugins. FlashPluginHacks?
I just thought Workarounds to be a bit long :-) what about FlashPluginFixes?
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 6
2010-09-24 06:09:25 PDT
Comment on
attachment 68510
[details]
proposed patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=68510&action=review
> WebKit2/WebProcess/Plugins/Netscape/NetscapeBrowserFuncs.cpp:447 > +#elif PLATFORM(QT)
Won't this be the same for GTK+ etc? Would it break anything having this enabled for all ports?
> WebKit2/WebProcess/Plugins/Netscape/NetscapePlugin.h:66 > +#if PLATFORM(QT) > + WebCore::PluginQuirkSet quirks() const { return m_quirks; } > +#endif
Shouldn't all platforms support plugin quirks?
> WebKit2/WebProcess/Plugins/Netscape/qt/NetscapePluginQt.cpp:52 > + } else if (FlashPluginWorkarounds::isFlashPlugin(pluginPath)) { > + // We have already loaded the plugin but initializeGTK > + // needs a QLibrary for resolving gtk_init. > + QLibrary flashPlugin(pluginPath); > + ASSERT(flashPlugin.load()); > + FlashPluginWorkarounds::initializeGTK(&flashPlugin);
So are we loading it twice?
Andreas Kling
Comment 7
2010-10-06 20:53:13 PDT
Balazs: ping
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 8
2010-10-10 10:00:58 PDT
(In reply to
comment #7
)
> Balazs: ping
Needs more investigation. I think there is some confusion in the old code paths (and comments) because not only the flash plugin needs the toolkit value workaround but all npwrappers. In the last 2 weeks I had no time for working on this, hopefully I can finish the patch in the next week.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 9
2010-10-10 10:04:35 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> (From update of
attachment 68510
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=68510&action=review
> > > WebKit2/WebProcess/Plugins/Netscape/NetscapeBrowserFuncs.cpp:447 > > +#elif PLATFORM(QT) > > Won't this be the same for GTK+ etc? Would it break anything having this enabled for all ports?
Right, it should be PLATFORM(UNIX)
> > > WebKit2/WebProcess/Plugins/Netscape/NetscapePlugin.h:66 > > +#if PLATFORM(QT) > > + WebCore::PluginQuirkSet quirks() const { return m_quirks; } > > +#endif > > Shouldn't all platforms support plugin quirks?
Likely. Will be added as common member in the next patch.
> > > WebKit2/WebProcess/Plugins/Netscape/qt/NetscapePluginQt.cpp:52 > > + } else if (FlashPluginWorkarounds::isFlashPlugin(pluginPath)) { > > + // We have already loaded the plugin but initializeGTK > > + // needs a QLibrary for resolving gtk_init. > > + QLibrary flashPlugin(pluginPath); > > + ASSERT(flashPlugin.load()); > > + FlashPluginWorkarounds::initializeGTK(&flashPlugin); > > So are we loading it twice?
I am almost sure about QLibrary does not load the same plugin twice (if it is even possible) but returns true if it is already loaded.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 10
2010-10-10 10:05:18 PDT
Comment on
attachment 68510
[details]
proposed patch Needs more investigation.
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 11
2010-10-25 09:41:34 PDT
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
bug 48127
***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug