WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED WONTFIX
45749
Extend YARR JIT with beginning character look-up optimization
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45749
Summary
Extend YARR JIT with beginning character look-up optimization
Peter Varga
Reported
2010-09-14 07:35:29 PDT
Search the start index of the first potential match before the pattern matching process. Use the vector of possible beginning characters which are collected by YARR's parser.
Attachments
proposed patch
(4.21 KB, patch)
2010-09-14 07:39 PDT
,
Peter Varga
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
proposed patch v2
(4.30 KB, patch)
2010-09-20 04:12 PDT
,
Peter Varga
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
proposed patch v3
(4.09 KB, patch)
2010-10-21 08:20 PDT
,
Peter Varga
eric
: review-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
proposed patch v3
(4.09 KB, patch)
2010-12-06 02:35 PST
,
Peter Varga
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(3)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Peter Varga
Comment 1
2010-09-14 07:39:47 PDT
Created
attachment 67548
[details]
proposed patch Performance results: ref mod regexp-dna: 1.060x as fast 21.1ms +/- 1.1% 19.9ms +/- 1.1% v8-regexp: 1.011x as slow 350.9ms +/- 0.2% 354.7ms +/- 0.1%
Early Warning System Bot
Comment 2
2010-09-14 07:54:49 PDT
Attachment 67548
[details]
did not build on qt: Build output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/3998008
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 3
2010-09-14 08:00:33 PDT
Attachment 67548
[details]
did not build on gtk: Build output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/4019006
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 4
2010-09-14 08:06:00 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
>
Attachment 67548
[details]
did not build on qt: > Build output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/3998008
It will build on Qt after
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
fixed.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 5
2010-09-14 08:48:34 PDT
Attachment 67548
[details]
did not build on win: Build output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/4017011
Geoffrey Garen
Comment 6
2010-09-14 13:53:00 PDT
Do you know why v8-regexp got slower?
Peter Varga
Comment 7
2010-09-15 07:19:01 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> Do you know why v8-regexp got slower?
I made some other measurements: - I increased the number of iterations in the v8-regexp benchmark. The ratio of the difference between the two results didn't increase. - I just measured with the parser's patch (
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
). I noticed that the slow-down still remains. - On another machine the v8 benchmark's results were different. v8-regexp was faster than the reference but other tests' (which don't contain regular expressions) performance results were different. I think it is caused by deviation. It looks like the slow-down with v8-regexp is caused by the beginning character collecting in the parser. I'm working on this problem.
Geoffrey Garen
Comment 8
2010-09-15 10:32:52 PDT
Any idea why this would slow down the JIT but not the interpreter? Your interpreter results show a solid improvement on v8-regexp. It's surprising that the JIT wouldn't improve as well.
Peter Varga
Comment 9
2010-09-15 11:34:28 PDT
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> Any idea why this would slow down the JIT but not the interpreter? Your interpreter results show a solid improvement on v8-regexp. It's surprising that the JIT wouldn't improve as well.
I think this optimization haven't enough possibilities to make faster the pattern matching in case of v8-regexp test. Therefore the overhead of the character collecting is greater than the profit of the optimization in case of JIT. However this optimization is more efficient in case of interpreter and the overhead of character collecting is same in both case, therefore the overhead should be negligible when the interpreter does the pattern matching.
Gavin Barraclough
Comment 10
2010-09-17 18:12:19 PDT
Hi Peter, I think Michael is going to take a look over your patch, since he's been working in this area at the minute. He has a patch on bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45787 that I imagine could conflict with this, which is at commit-queue+ at the minute. You may need to update your patches once this has landed to resolve any merge issues. cheers, G.
Peter Varga
Comment 11
2010-09-20 04:12:42 PDT
Created
attachment 68070
[details]
proposed patch v2 updated patch for top of trunk.
Early Warning System Bot
Comment 12
2010-09-20 04:19:41 PDT
Attachment 68070
[details]
did not build on qt: Build output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/4035090
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 13
2010-09-20 04:52:45 PDT
Attachment 68070
[details]
did not build on gtk: Build output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/4084022
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 14
2010-09-20 05:08:11 PDT
Attachment 68070
[details]
did not build on win: Build output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/4031067
Peter Varga
Comment 15
2010-09-20 09:20:10 PDT
The new performance results without the collecting of character classes: ref mod regexp-dna: 1.055x as fast 21.1ms +/- 1.1% 20.0ms +/- 0.0% v8-regexp: ?? 316.6ms +/- 0.6% 317.6ms +/- 0.2%
Peter Varga
Comment 16
2010-10-21 08:20:56 PDT
Created
attachment 71439
[details]
proposed patch v3 update patch.
Early Warning System Bot
Comment 17
2010-11-16 13:08:29 PST
Attachment 71439
[details]
did not build on qt: Build output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/6117003
Build Bot
Comment 18
2010-11-16 15:18:22 PST
Attachment 71439
[details]
did not build on win: Build output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/5992105
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 19
2010-12-03 13:30:15 PST
Comment on
attachment 71439
[details]
proposed patch v3 r- for qt and win failures.
Peter Varga
Comment 20
2010-12-06 02:35:41 PST
Created
attachment 75659
[details]
proposed patch v3 I upload the previous patch again. It has failed on the last ews check because a depedency wasn't landed but now it seems ok.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 21
2011-05-23 11:00:10 PDT
Oliver, Gavin: This patch has been up for review for 6 months. it's tiny. Please r- it or r+ it. I will r- this next week if it still remains undecided.
Gavin Barraclough
Comment 22
2011-05-23 14:22:49 PDT
Comment on
attachment 75659
[details]
proposed patch v3 Clearing review flag pending 61306
Gavin Barraclough
Comment 23
2011-05-24 13:02:02 PDT
Marking this won't fix based on resolution to
r61306
.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug