WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
45694
'seeking' event should always fire
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45694
Summary
'seeking' event should always fire
Eric Carlson
Reported
2010-09-13 11:51:24 PDT
In r5219 the spec was changed to require the 'seeking' event to always fire.
Attachments
Proposed patch.
(6.67 KB, patch)
2010-09-13 12:15 PDT
,
Eric Carlson
simon.fraser
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Revised patch
(6.88 KB, patch)
2010-09-23 09:00 PDT
,
Eric Carlson
simon.fraser
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Eric Carlson
Comment 1
2010-09-13 12:15:55 PDT
Created
attachment 67449
[details]
Proposed patch.
Eric Carlson
Comment 2
2010-09-23 09:00:25 PDT
Created
attachment 68527
[details]
Revised patch
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 3
2010-09-23 11:39:34 PDT
Comment on
attachment 67449
[details]
Proposed patch. View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=67449&action=review
> WebCore/ChangeLog:6 > + 'seeking' event should always fire > +
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45694
Is this just a change to the spec that we're following? If so, the changelog should say.
> WebCore/html/HTMLMediaElement.cpp:1099 > + // 2 - If the element's seeking IDL attribute is true, then another instance of this algorithm is > + // already running. Abort that other instance of the algorithm without waiting for the step that > + // it is running to complete.
I don't understand how "another instance of the algorithm" can be running on the same element. Can the comment clarify this?
Eric Carlson
Comment 4
2010-09-23 12:38:20 PDT
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/68181
Ademar Reis
Comment 5
2011-01-24 12:17:44 PST
Revision
r68181
cherry-picked into qtwebkit-2.2 with commit d7a0127 <
http://gitorious.org/webkit/qtwebkit/commit/d7a0127
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug