Per discussions, we've decided to rename TransformationMatrix to Transform for consistency.
Not sure I agree. SVG already has SVGTransform, which has an SVGMatrix.
(In reply to comment #1) > Not sure I agree. SVG already has SVGTransform, which has an SVGMatrix. And we have CSSMatrix. It's a bit muddled. But SVGMatrix is a simple wrapper around AffineTransform and SVGTransform contains an AffineTransform. CSSMatrix contains a TransformationMatrix. I don't think we're going to solve the "transform" vs "matrix" naming of the DOM objects. So I think the best we can do is make the underlying classes consistent. AffineTransform and Transform seem as consistent as we're going to get.