WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
44761
[Qt] tst_QWebView::focusInputTypes() fails on MeeGo Handset with WebKit 2.1
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44761
Summary
[Qt] tst_QWebView::focusInputTypes() fails on MeeGo Handset with WebKit 2.1
Benjamin Poulain
Reported
2010-08-27 05:21:34 PDT
The test tst_QWebView::focusInputTypes() is not reliable on Meego Handset. Output of the bot: FAIL! : tst_QWebView::focusInputTypes() 'webView->inputMethodHints() == Qt::ImhHiddenText' returned FALSE. ()
Attachments
Make the test more robust
(8.33 KB, patch)
2010-08-27 05:28 PDT
,
Benjamin Poulain
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Improve the test further
(5.80 KB, patch)
2010-09-27 07:53 PDT
,
Benjamin Poulain
kling
: review+
kling
: commit-queue+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Benjamin Poulain
Comment 1
2010-08-27 05:28:00 PDT
Created
attachment 65703
[details]
Make the test more robust On my hardware, this fixes the problems with webView.inputMethodHints(). However, I still have random failures out of QVERIFY(webView.testAttribute(Qt::WA_InputMethodEnabled)). Those cannot be reproduced in gdb so I suspect a race condition. The test bot has a different environment, we'll see if this patch fixes the failure.
Antonio Gomes
Comment 2
2010-08-27 05:30:53 PDT
Comment on
attachment 65703
[details]
Make the test more robust Good work!
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 3
2010-08-27 22:18:55 PDT
Comment on
attachment 65703
[details]
Make the test more robust Clearing flags on attachment: 65703 Committed
r66298
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/66298
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 4
2010-08-27 22:18:59 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Ademar Reis
Comment 5
2010-08-30 10:32:39 PDT
Revision
r66298
cherry-picked into qtwebkit-2.1 with commit 7c8ea628dd2c7d5c05e1682059d6178b2f8bc7e6
Benjamin Poulain
Comment 6
2010-09-27 07:53:20 PDT
Created
attachment 68911
[details]
Improve the test further The test still fails on the test bots for an unknown reason. I hope to get more info from the output with this patch while still improving the test. Using QCOMPARE() instead of QVERIFY() will output the return value so will help identifying the issue. Adding the "hasFocus()" on each element will help identifying if the element got the focus at all on the device.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug