Bug 43557 - REGRESSION: Unable to open gmail messages (unshift broken?)
Summary: REGRESSION: Unable to open gmail messages (unshift broken?)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: JavaScriptCore (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Mac (Intel) OS X 10.6
: P1 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL: http://mail.google.com/
Keywords: Regression
: 43576 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-08-05 06:20 PDT by John Moe
Modified: 2010-08-06 06:14 PDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description John Moe 2010-08-05 06:20:27 PDT
1. Go to gmail.
2. Click on a message.
Nothing happens.

Is this related to Bug 43314?  It worked in nightlies before the crashing began and has not worked since the crashing was fixed.
Comment 1 John Moe 2010-08-05 06:22:28 PDT
This error is logged:
TypeError: Result of expression 'b.b[e]' [undefined] is not an object.   line 124

line 124:
function jha(b,a){for(var c=[a],d=jd(b.b[a].P4);d.length;){var e=d.pop();if(!b.b[e].nd()){c.unshift(e);Array.prototype.unshift.apply(d,b.b[e].P4)}}md(c);return c}function kha(b){if(b.B==b.Q){b.B=j;b.Q.DL(v(b.xa,b))}}function bi(b,a){b.b[a].DL(v(b.xa,b));ed(b.D,a);ed(b.h,a);b.h.length==0&&lha(b);ai(b)}function ci(b,a){b.Z=j;b.B=b.b[a]}function di(b,a){!b.B||a!=b.B.Fa();b.B=j}
Comment 2 Michael Saboff 2010-08-05 13:11:11 PDT
I actually believe that this issue is related to https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43401 which has been fixed and landed.
Comment 3 Shamil Kerimov 2010-08-05 13:14:57 PDT
I can surely confirm this bug which forced me to revert to Safari (5.0.1) from WebKit nightly. It started to happen about a week ago.

JS console shows exactly the same error as mentioned above.
Comment 4 Gavin Barraclough 2010-08-05 13:32:41 PDT
Should be fixed in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43401 , landed in r63470.
Please reopen this bug is issue persists in nightly after this revision.
Comment 5 Shamil Kerimov 2010-08-05 13:38:36 PDT
are you sure that it was landed in r63470 and not in r64773? using r64727 and still having this issue.
Comment 6 Gavin Barraclough 2010-08-05 13:41:31 PDT
My bad, yep, meant to say should be fixed in r64773.
Comment 7 Alexey Proskuryakov 2010-08-06 06:14:20 PDT
*** Bug 43576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***