RESOLVED FIXED Bug 43170
[Qt] Factor LauncherWindow class out of main.cpp (QtTestBrowser)
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43170
Summary [Qt] Factor LauncherWindow class out of main.cpp (QtTestBrowser)
Antonio Gomes
Reported 2010-07-28 21:19:36 PDT
In my opinion, it does not belongs to this file and has grown enough to desive its own file.
Attachments
(commit=r64291 , r=kenneth) patch v1 - add launcherwindow.cpp and h (79.19 KB, patch)
2010-07-29 09:29 PDT, Antonio Gomes
no flags
Antonio Gomes
Comment 1 2010-07-29 09:29:55 PDT
Created attachment 62959 [details] (commit=r64291 , r=kenneth) patch v1 - add launcherwindow.cpp and h
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 2 2010-07-29 09:32:23 PDT
Attachment 62959 [details] did not pass style-queue: Failed to run "['WebKitTools/Scripts/check-webkit-style']" exit_code: 1 WebKitTools/QtTestBrowser/launcherwindow.h:70: Alphabetical sorting problem. [build/include_order] [4] WebKitTools/QtTestBrowser/launcherwindow.cpp:33: Found header this file implements before WebCore config.h. Should be: config.h, primary header, blank line, and then alphabetically sorted. [build/include_order] [4] WebKitTools/QtTestBrowser/main.cpp:33: Found other header before WebCore config.h. Should be: config.h, primary header, blank line, and then alphabetically sorted. [build/include_order] [4] Total errors found: 3 in 5 files If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 3 2010-07-29 10:37:45 PDT
Comment on attachment 62959 [details] (commit=r64291 , r=kenneth) patch v1 - add launcherwindow.cpp and h we probably want to handle the globals differently? Are you planning this?
Antonio Gomes
Comment 4 2010-07-29 11:01:01 PDT
Comment on attachment 62959 [details] (commit=r64291 , r=kenneth) patch v1 - add launcherwindow.cpp and h Clearing flags on attachment: 62959 Committed r64291: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/64291>
Antonio Gomes
Comment 5 2010-07-29 11:01:39 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 62959 [details]) > we probably want to handle the globals differently? Are you planning this? Yes, in a follow up.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.