RESOLVED FIXED Bug 42625
sputnik S15.9.3.1_A5_T1~T6 fail when run in timezone other than Pacific Time 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42625
Summary sputnik S15.9.3.1_A5_T1~T6 fail when run in timezone other than Pacific Time
Xianzhu Wang
Reported 2010-07-20 03:34:20 PDT
On a machine whose timezone is not Pacific Time, the following tests fail: fast/js/sputnik/Conformance/15_Native_Objects/15.9_Date/15.9.3/S15.9.3.1_A5_T1.html -> failed . fast/js/sputnik/Conformance/15_Native_Objects/15.9_Date/15.9.3/S15.9.3.1_A5_T2.html -> failed . fast/js/sputnik/Conformance/15_Native_Objects/15.9_Date/15.9.3/S15.9.3.1_A5_T3.html -> failed . fast/js/sputnik/Conformance/15_Native_Objects/15.9_Date/15.9.3/S15.9.3.1_A5_T4.html -> failed . fast/js/sputnik/Conformance/15_Native_Objects/15.9_Date/15.9.3/S15.9.3.1_A5_T5.html -> failed . fast/js/sputnik/Conformance/15_Native_Objects/15.9_Date/15.9.3/S15.9.3.1_A5_T6.html -> failed
Attachments
Patch (4.49 KB, patch)
2010-08-17 10:28 PDT, Eric Seidel (no email) 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (168.26 KB, patch)
2012-08-23 10:33 PDT, Zan Dobersek 		eric: review-
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 1 2010-07-20 10:13:02 PDT
We should probably just disable those tests then.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 2 2010-08-17 10:21:09 PDT
Agreed.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 3 2010-08-17 10:28:04 PDT
Created attachment 64605 [details] Patch
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 4 2010-08-17 10:48:30 PDT
Comment on attachment 64605 [details] Patch r=me.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 5 2010-08-17 11:07:21 PDT
Comment on attachment 64605 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 64605 Committed r65519: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/65519>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 6 2010-08-17 11:07:25 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Zan Dobersek
Comment 7 2012-08-02 23:00:07 PDT
Could these tests be skipped if the system's timezone is incorrect? Similarly to how some tests are skipped based on missing symbols in modules.
Zan Dobersek
Comment 8 2012-08-23 10:33:44 PDT
Reopening to attach new patch.
Zan Dobersek
Comment 9 2012-08-23 10:33:47 PDT
Created attachment 160193 [details] Patch
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 10 2012-08-23 10:50:10 PDT
Honestly, I don't think that having these tests enabled on some machines is worth the complexity. We should just remove sputnik tests and migrate to ecma-262 official suite. Maintaining that seems more worth the effort long term.
Zan Dobersek
Comment 11 2012-08-23 10:54:22 PDT
(In reply to comment #10) > Honestly, I don't think that having these tests enabled on some machines is worth the complexity. > > We should just remove sputnik tests and migrate to ecma-262 official suite. Maintaining that seems more worth the effort long term. I'm supportive of the migration, but these tests (or their equivalents) are still present in the ecma-262 suite though.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 12 2012-08-23 10:55:34 PDT
Is there a way to file bugs or submit patches to the official suite to get these fixed?
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 13 2012-08-23 11:02:46 PDT
Comment on attachment 160193 [details] Patch We could also just delete them. I suspect this will just end up being confusing. :)
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 14 2012-08-23 11:26:38 PDT
My suggestion is to keep these tests disabled unconditionally, and try to get official tests fixed.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 15 2012-08-23 11:43:55 PDT
Comment on attachment 160193 [details] Patch I don't think it really matters what we do with these tests. I think the status quo is fine, and this patch isn't really worth the complexity. I appreciate you looking at the problem!
Zan Dobersek
Comment 16 2012-09-03 23:57:08 PDT
(In reply to comment #12) > Is there a way to file bugs or submit patches to the official suite to get these fixed? The bug's already reported in the Ecmascript Bugzilla: https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.