WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
42219
AX: VoiceOver cannot navigate this page because Safari is taking too long
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42219
Summary
AX: VoiceOver cannot navigate this page because Safari is taking too long
chris fleizach
Reported
2010-07-13 17:48:56 PDT
VoiceOver can't navigate this page because Safari is used absoluteFocusRingQuads() to calculate the size of the web area, which descends into every child element and sums up the rectangles.
http://www.siye.co.uk/siye/viewstory.php?action=printable&textsize=0&sid=12548&chapter=all#top
I think the web area should not use absoluteFocusRingQuads(), but absoluteQuads() instead
Attachments
patch
(1.49 KB, patch)
2010-07-13 17:50 PDT
,
chris fleizach
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch
(1.49 KB, patch)
2010-07-13 17:51 PDT
,
chris fleizach
darin
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
chris fleizach
Comment 1
2010-07-13 17:50:58 PDT
Created
attachment 61441
[details]
patch
chris fleizach
Comment 2
2010-07-13 17:51:52 PDT
Created
attachment 61442
[details]
patch
Darin Adler
Comment 3
2010-07-13 22:12:02 PDT
Comment on
attachment 61442
[details]
patch
> + // absoluteFocusRingQuads will query the hierarchy below this element, which for large webpages can be very slow. > + // For a web area, which will have the most elements of any element, absoluteQuads should be used.
Are there any other cases where absoluteQuads would be better? Should absoluteFocusRungQuads itself have an optimization for this case? r=me
chris fleizach
Comment 4
2010-07-13 22:24:21 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (From update of
attachment 61442
[details]
) > > + // absoluteFocusRingQuads will query the hierarchy below this element, which for large webpages can be very slow. > > + // For a web area, which will have the most elements of any element, absoluteQuads should be used. > > Are there any other cases where absoluteQuads would be better? Should absoluteFocusRungQuads itself have an optimization for this case? >
I was trying to think of other cases that might be pertinent (AXGroups being the best candidate), but it seemed more prudent to wait for evidence of those cases than make assumptions here. I looked through absoluteFocusRingQuads and given that the nature of the function seems to iterate every child, it didn't look like there was much that could be done (since there are over 15000 children of this web area). If you have any ideas off the top of your head please let me know.
> r=me
chris fleizach
Comment 5
2010-07-14 13:31:17 PDT
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/63350
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug