WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
42168
REGRESSION (
r63192
): Pixel test failure in contain-and-cover.html
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42168
Summary
REGRESSION (r63192): Pixel test failure in contain-and-cover.html
Pavel Podivilov
Reported
2010-07-13 08:40:41 PDT
contain-and-cover.html start failing after
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/63192
,
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall.fyi/builders/Webkit%20Linux%20(webkit.org)/builds/32026
Could you please have a look?
Attachments
add contain-and-cover.html to test_expectations
(1.05 KB, patch)
2010-07-13 08:51 PDT
,
Pavel Podivilov
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Jeremy Orlow
Comment 1
2010-07-13 08:47:55 PDT
Why am I cc'ed on this? Also you really need to provide WAY more information to non-Chromium contributors. There's basically no context here. And no link to where he can see the actual failing test/results. (Hopefully we'll be able to get pixel tests working on build.webkit.org soon!)
Pavel Podivilov
Comment 2
2010-07-13 08:51:02 PDT
Created
attachment 61383
[details]
add contain-and-cover.html to test_expectations
Jeremy Orlow
Comment 3
2010-07-13 08:53:18 PDT
Is this a real regression? If so (and you can't get ahold of Andreas) then you should revert it and not paper over the regression. If it's not a real regression then you should probably go ahead and check in a new baseline.
Pavel Podivilov
Comment 4
2010-07-13 09:03:43 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> Is this a real regression? If so (and you can't get ahold of Andreas) then you should revert it and not paper over the regression. If it's not a real regression then you should probably go ahead and check in a new baseline.
I've cc'ed you just because you were in
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38108
which seemed very similar to this problem. I'm not sure if it's a regression or not, that's why I've created this bug.
Andreas Kling
Comment 5
2010-07-13 09:09:53 PDT
Just a quick note to let you know I'm looking at this right now.
Pavel Podivilov
Comment 6
2010-07-13 09:15:08 PDT
(In reply to
comment #5
)
> Just a quick note to let you know I'm looking at this right now.
Andreas, it's my bad, this is actually the same problem as
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38108
, and absolutely not connected to
r63192
. For some reason image diff was first detected by buildbots just after your change.
Pavel Podivilov
Comment 7
2010-07-13 09:19:25 PDT
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
bug 38108
***
Andreas Kling
Comment 8
2010-07-13 09:22:36 PDT
Not so fast, this actually did regress with my change (
r63192
). Didn't notice it since we don't have pixel tests for Qt. ;( Working on a fix right now.
Pavel Podivilov
Comment 9
2010-07-13 09:29:41 PDT
If so, could you please revert it? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
bug 38108
***
Pavel Podivilov
Comment 10
2010-07-13 09:32:50 PDT
Duplicate -> Unconfirmed
Andreas Kling
Comment 11
2010-07-13 09:38:48 PDT
Reverted with <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/63213
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug