contain-and-cover.html start failing after http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/63192, http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall.fyi/builders/Webkit%20Linux%20(webkit.org)/builds/32026 Could you please have a look?
Why am I cc'ed on this? Also you really need to provide WAY more information to non-Chromium contributors. There's basically no context here. And no link to where he can see the actual failing test/results. (Hopefully we'll be able to get pixel tests working on build.webkit.org soon!)
Created attachment 61383 [details] add contain-and-cover.html to test_expectations
Is this a real regression? If so (and you can't get ahold of Andreas) then you should revert it and not paper over the regression. If it's not a real regression then you should probably go ahead and check in a new baseline.
(In reply to comment #3) > Is this a real regression? If so (and you can't get ahold of Andreas) then you should revert it and not paper over the regression. If it's not a real regression then you should probably go ahead and check in a new baseline. I've cc'ed you just because you were in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38108 which seemed very similar to this problem. I'm not sure if it's a regression or not, that's why I've created this bug.
Just a quick note to let you know I'm looking at this right now.
(In reply to comment #5) > Just a quick note to let you know I'm looking at this right now. Andreas, it's my bad, this is actually the same problem as https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38108, and absolutely not connected to r63192. For some reason image diff was first detected by buildbots just after your change.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38108 ***
Not so fast, this actually did regress with my change (r63192). Didn't notice it since we don't have pixel tests for Qt. ;( Working on a fix right now.
If so, could you please revert it? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38108 ***
Duplicate -> Unconfirmed
Reverted with <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/63213>