WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 41930
[Qt] QtWebKit doesn't build in debug on Windows
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41930
Summary
[Qt] QtWebKit doesn't build in debug on Windows
Mahesh Kulkarni
Reported
2010-07-08 22:34:39 PDT
qtwebkit on windows for debug version complains with linker errors. Disabling incremental build fixes the issue with msvs
Attachments
fixes build issue
(972 bytes, patch)
2010-07-09 02:00 PDT
,
Mahesh Kulkarni
hausmann
: review-
hausmann
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
updated comments
(1.23 KB, patch)
2010-07-15 02:08 PDT
,
Mahesh Kulkarni
kling
: review-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch
(1.36 KB, patch)
2010-11-23 01:28 PST
,
Mahesh Kulkarni
eric
: review-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch
(1.33 KB, patch)
2010-12-21 03:34 PST
,
Mahesh Kulkarni
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(3)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Mahesh Kulkarni
Comment 1
2010-07-09 02:00:30 PDT
Created
attachment 61018
[details]
fixes build issue On both win32-msvc2005|win32-msvc2008, qtwebkit doesn't build for debug. Release would anyway have this flag set. This patch proposes to add the flag to debug version as well.
Andreas Kling
Comment 2
2010-07-09 05:20:05 PDT
This is a 32-bit only issue, no? AFAIK incremental linking works just fine on 64-bit. We don't want to turn it off for everyone in that case. Could you paste the error message you're getting from the linker?
Mahesh Kulkarni
Comment 3
2010-07-10 00:35:56 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> This is a 32-bit only issue, no? > > AFAIK incremental linking works just fine on 64-bit. We don't want to turn it off for everyone in that case. > > Could you paste the error message you're getting from the linker?
Yes mine is 32-bit machine. As per your comments probably this change needs to be done only for 32-bit machines. The error we get on all 32 bit machines here while linking webkit dll, "LINK : fatal error LNK1210: exceeded internal ILK size limit; link with /INCREMENTAL:NO"
Mahesh Kulkarni
Comment 4
2010-07-10 00:37:58 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (In reply to
comment #2
) > > This is a 32-bit only issue, no? > > > > AFAIK incremental linking works just fine on 64-bit. We don't want to turn it off for everyone in that case. > > > > Could you paste the error message you're getting from the linker? > > Yes mine is 32-bit machine. As per your comments probably this change needs to be done only for 32-bit machines. > > The error we get on all 32 bit machines here while linking webkit dll, > "LINK : fatal error LNK1210: exceeded internal ILK size limit; link with > /INCREMENTAL:NO"
opps, the patch does it only for 32-bit windows machines already!
Andreas Kling
Comment 5
2010-07-10 08:34:18 PDT
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> > The error we get on all 32 bit machines here while linking webkit dll, > > "LINK : fatal error LNK1210: exceeded internal ILK size limit; link with > > /INCREMENTAL:NO" > > opps, the patch does it only for 32-bit windows machines already!
Ok, this makes sense to me. CC'ing Simon for review.
Laszlo Gombos
Comment 6
2010-07-10 18:35:28 PDT
I might be wrong but I do not think "win32" is just for 32 bit. To test for 64 bit one should try "contains(QMAKE_HOST.arch, x86_64)". Best is to try/test on 64 bit machine.
Simon Hausmann
Comment 7
2010-07-11 01:42:35 PDT
Comment on
attachment 61018
[details]
fixes build issue If you look at mkspecs/win32*/qmake.conf in Qt, then you can see that we use INCREMENTAL:NO for release builds: QMAKE_LFLAGS_RELEASE = /INCREMENTAL:NO I think a cleaner fix would be to use either QMAKE_LFLAGS_DEBUG += or at the very least add a comment in the .pro file what exactly this magic line tries to achieve. For example: # Release builds disable incremental # linking. Disable it also for debug # builds because WebKit is so big # that the linker fails to link # incrementally in debug builds. QMAKE_LFLAGS_DEBUG += /INCREMENTAL:NO
Mahesh Kulkarni
Comment 8
2010-07-15 02:08:56 PDT
Created
attachment 61618
[details]
updated comments updated patch as per comments #7 from Simon.
Mahesh Kulkarni
Comment 9
2010-07-15 02:11:48 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> I might be wrong but I do not think "win32" is just for 32 bit. To test for 64 bit one should try "contains(QMAKE_HOST.arch, x86_64)". > > Best is to try/test on 64 bit machine.
I do not have 64-bit machine to try the latest patch out :( Andreas Kling, would it be able possible for you to test this on your 64-bit machine?
Jocelyn Turcotte
Comment 10
2010-07-15 05:32:26 PDT
(In reply to
comment #9
) I tried contains(QMAKE_HOST.arch, x86_64) but this would disable incremental linking when qmake is compiled as 32bit on a 64bit machine. Something like this might work, the PROCESSOR_ARCHITEW6432 environment variable is only defined when running a 32bit process on a 64bit Windows. ( info:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david.wang/archive/2006/03/26/howto-detect-process-bitness.aspx
) ARCH = $$(PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE) WOW64ARCH = $$(PROCESSOR_ARCHITEW6432) equals(ARCH, x86): isEmpty(WOW64ARCH): QMAKE_LFLAGS_DEBUG += /INCREMENTAL:NO Also please span your comment on less lines (something like 100 chars wide), this would help keeping the scrolling convenint in that file while searching for a specific line.
Mahesh Kulkarni
Comment 11
2010-07-19 11:30:16 PDT
(In reply to
comment #10
)
> (In reply to
comment #9
) > > I tried contains(QMAKE_HOST.arch, x86_64) but this would disable incremental linking when qmake is compiled as 32bit on a 64bit machine. > > Something like this might work, the PROCESSOR_ARCHITEW6432 environment variable is only defined when running a 32bit process on a 64bit Windows. > ( info:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david.wang/archive/2006/03/26/howto-detect-process-bitness.aspx
) > > ARCH = $$(PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE) > WOW64ARCH = $$(PROCESSOR_ARCHITEW6432) > equals(ARCH, x86): isEmpty(WOW64ARCH): QMAKE_LFLAGS_DEBUG += /INCREMENTAL:NO > > Also please span your comment on less lines (something like 100 chars wide), this would help keeping the scrolling convenint in that file while searching for a specific line.
Jocelyn, we see the same issue even on 32-bit windows OS on 64 bit machine. We tested this again on 64 bit machine, as long as its a 32-bit windows OS, incremental build fails. I will upload the patch again with lesser lines in comments section. Laszlo, any comments on existing fix?
Jocelyn Turcotte
Comment 12
2010-08-02 01:35:37 PDT
(In reply to
comment #11
)
> Jocelyn, we see the same issue even on 32-bit windows OS on 64 bit machine. > We tested this again on 64 bit machine, as long as its a 32-bit windows OS, incremental build fails. > > I will upload the patch again with lesser lines in comments section. > > Laszlo, any comments on existing fix?
I meant a 64bit OS on a 64bit machine when I wrote "64bit machine", sorry for the confusion.
Andreas Kling
Comment 13
2010-08-17 05:59:27 PDT
Comment on
attachment 61618
[details]
updated comments
>WebCore/WebCore.pro:110 > + win32-msvc2005|win32-msvc2008:{
This will affect both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows. r- because we need to find a solution that doesn't unnecessarily hurt linking time on 64-bit Windows.
Mahesh Kulkarni
Comment 14
2010-11-23 01:28:13 PST
Created
attachment 74634
[details]
patch Jocelyn Turcotte, Thanks. Updated patch as per
comment #10
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 15
2010-11-23 02:38:49 PST
Comment on
attachment 74634
[details]
patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=74634&action=review
> WebCore/WebCore.pro:131 > + # Disable incremental linking for windows 32bit OS debug build as WebKit so big
WebKit so big? Do you mean "WebKit is so big" ?
> WebCore/WebCore.pro:132 > + # that linker failes to link incrementally in debug mode
You need a dot at the end; that is WebKit comment style.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 16
2010-12-03 11:02:46 PST
Comment on
attachment 74634
[details]
patch Seems OK besides the above comment comments. Are you going to post a new patch for krc?
Mahesh Kulkarni
Comment 17
2010-12-21 03:34:54 PST
Created
attachment 77098
[details]
patch Changes made as per
comment #15
. Please review.
Andreas Kling
Comment 18
2010-12-21 04:35:48 PST
Comment on
attachment 77098
[details]
patch Much better! r=me :)
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 19
2010-12-21 05:11:38 PST
Comment on
attachment 77098
[details]
patch Clearing flags on attachment: 77098 Committed
r74409
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/74409
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 20
2010-12-21 05:11:47 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug