RESOLVED FIXED Bug 40097
Chromium NotificationPresenter tries to ref objects that are being destroyed
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40097
Summary Chromium NotificationPresenter tries to ref objects that are being destroyed
Peter Kasting
Reported 2010-06-02 18:57:02 PDT
After r60569 to fix bug 39998, Chromium code began consistently failing an ASSERT in RefCounted. This is because NotificationPresenterImpl::notificationObjectDestroyed(), which is called with a Notification object that is being destroyed, tries to ref the object. This is clearly wrong, but the code presumably used to not ASSERT due to other refcounting problems fixed by the aforementioned checkin. I'm going to make an emergency fix to simply do nothing in this function, since a large number of different Chromium tests are failing at the moment. The right fix is presumably to move where this is called to be before the Notification is actually deleted, or perhaps to avoid refing the object here (although that seems perilous too).
Attachments
Emergency fix as landed (1.57 KB, patch)
2010-06-02 19:00 PDT, Peter Kasting
no flags
Patch (4.56 KB, patch)
2010-06-03 14:21 PDT, John Gregg
no flags
Patch (4.76 KB, patch)
2010-06-03 14:53 PDT, John Gregg
no flags
Patch (4.69 KB, patch)
2010-06-14 12:09 PDT, John Gregg
no flags
Patch (4.73 KB, patch)
2010-06-14 15:14 PDT, John Gregg
no flags
Peter Kasting
Comment 1 2010-06-02 19:00:55 PDT
Created attachment 57725 [details] Emergency fix as landed Here's the fix I landed in r60590.
Yael
Comment 2 2010-06-02 19:20:13 PDT
Sorry for causing this trouble. Please let me know if you are making changes to the Notifications design, because I am in the process of upstreaming the Qt implementation for notifications. thanks!
John Gregg
Comment 3 2010-06-03 14:21:58 PDT
John Gregg
Comment 4 2010-06-03 14:53:12 PDT
Yael
Comment 5 2010-06-03 16:44:02 PDT
With the current code in WebKit, a notification object can outlive the page that created it. So you can navigate to another page, and the notification is still visible. This change is going to caouse the notification object to be destroyed when navigating to another page. Is that change intentional?
John Gregg
Comment 6 2010-06-03 16:52:51 PDT
I don't see how the patch necessarily causes any change to the lifetime of the object. It depends on what the presenter does in notificationObjectDestroyed(), though. For example, if that function is {}, I think this patch is a no-op (outside of the chromium part)
John Gregg
Comment 7 2010-06-03 16:54:36 PDT
Perhaps notificationObjectDestroyed is a poor name for that function anyway. The point is to inform the presenter not to call events on the Notification anymore even if it chooses to continue showing it. Maybe notificationDetached (or just contextDestroyed) would be a better name.
Yael
Comment 8 2010-06-03 17:03:53 PDT
(In reply to comment #6) > I don't see how the patch necessarily causes any change to the lifetime of the object. It depends on what the presenter does in notificationObjectDestroyed(), though. > > For example, if that function is {}, I think this patch is a no-op (outside of the chromium part) Thanks for the explanation. I guess the difference in our approaches is that in Chrome you can continue to show a notification after the JS object was destroyed, but in my code, I did not allow for that. I'll have to see how to adjust.
David Levin
Comment 9 2010-06-14 11:35:52 PDT
Comment on attachment 57816 [details] Patch > Index: WebCore/ChangeLog > + > + No new tests. (OOPS!) Needs explanation.
John Gregg
Comment 10 2010-06-14 12:09:51 PDT
Yael
Comment 11 2010-06-14 14:02:31 PDT
Comment on attachment 58683 [details] Patch I have a couple of comments, even though I am not a reviewer :-) > > +void Notification::contextDestroyed() > +{ > + if (m_presenter) > + m_presenter->notificationObjectDestroyed(this); > +} > This should call the base class to set m_scriptExecutionObject=0. It is possible for the Notification object to be deleted before contextDestroyed() is called, and in those cases you will end up not calling notificationObjectDestroyed() at all.
John Gregg
Comment 12 2010-06-14 15:12:44 PDT
(In reply to comment #11) > (From update of attachment 58683 [details]) > I have a couple of comments, even though I am not a reviewer :-) > > > > +void Notification::contextDestroyed() > > +{ > > + if (m_presenter) > > + m_presenter->notificationObjectDestroyed(this); > > +} > > > > This should call the base class to set m_scriptExecutionObject=0. Done. > It is possible for the Notification object to be deleted before contextDestroyed() is called, and in those cases you will end up not calling notificationObjectDestroyed() at all. It's only necessary to call notificationObjectDestroyed() after calling show(). Are you talking about cases where the object is actually used in a script context, then deleted before contextDestroyed() is called, or other cases where it's deleted before being attached to a context?
John Gregg
Comment 13 2010-06-14 15:14:31 PDT
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 14 2010-06-17 02:29:33 PDT
Comment on attachment 58708 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 58708 Committed r61316: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/61316>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 15 2010-06-17 02:29:38 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.