WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED WONTFIX
40063
Web Inspector: make SourceFrame BreakpointManager's listener
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40063
Summary
Web Inspector: make SourceFrame BreakpointManager's listener
Yury Semikhatsky
Reported
2010-06-02 08:14:37 PDT
1. Make SourceFrame BreakpointManager's listener 1.1. Make SourceFrame responsible for filling breakpoints on creation (few addBreakpoint snippets will go away from ScriptsPanel) 2. Remove _sourceFrameForScriptOrResource from the ScriptsPanel(most of its usages are needed to populate new SourceView with existing breakpoints).
Attachments
Patch
(18.14 KB, patch)
2010-06-03 11:09 PDT
,
Yury Semikhatsky
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch
(17.66 KB, patch)
2010-06-04 06:26 PDT
,
Yury Semikhatsky
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Yury Semikhatsky
Comment 1
2010-06-03 11:09:09 PDT
Created
attachment 57791
[details]
Patch
Pavel Feldman
Comment 2
2010-06-03 11:45:12 PDT
Comment on
attachment 57791
[details]
Patch WebCore/inspector/front-end/ScriptsPanel.js:279 + if (script._scriptView) { Nit: encapsulate this into script.disposeView(); WebCore/inspector/front-end/ScriptsPanel.js:448 + object._scriptView.willRemoveScript(); Why is this needed? WebCore/inspector/front-end/SourceFrame.js:198 + if (!(breakpoint.sourceID in this._scriptIds)) { So you ended up with making SourceFrame both sourceID and sourceURL aware without external binding. It might be simple, not sure it is good design-wise though. WebCore/inspector/front-end/SourceView.js:129 + this.sourceFrame.addBreakpointsForURL(resource.sourceURL); I thought the point was to make SourceFrame breakpoint manager's listener so that breakpoints are not populated from outside. WebCore/inspector/front-end/SourceView.js:240 + this.localSourceFrame = new WebInspector.SourceFrame(this.localContentElement, null, null, null, null); just pass single parameter.
Yury Semikhatsky
Comment 3
2010-06-04 06:25:16 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> (From update of
attachment 57791
[details]
) > WebCore/inspector/front-end/ScriptsPanel.js:279 > + if (script._scriptView) { > Nit: encapsulate this into script.disposeView(); >
Script and Resource are not aware of there views (despite they have _sourceView and _scriptView fields) that is why I didn't add disposeView to them.
> WebCore/inspector/front-end/ScriptsPanel.js:448 > + object._scriptView.willRemoveScript(); > Why is this needed? >
To remove SourceFrame from BreakpointManager listeners list.
> WebCore/inspector/front-end/SourceFrame.js:198 > + if (!(breakpoint.sourceID in this._scriptIds)) { > So you ended up with making SourceFrame both sourceID and sourceURL aware without external binding. It might be simple, not sure it is good design-wise though. >
We need either them or a filter to detect breakpoints that should be displayed.
> WebCore/inspector/front-end/SourceView.js:129 > + this.sourceFrame.addBreakpointsForURL(resource.sourceURL); > I thought the point was to make SourceFrame breakpoint manager's listener so that breakpoints are not populated from outside. >
Adding listeners to BreakpointManager is not enough because we need to pull breakpoints that already exist when SourceFrame is being created. I'm open to alternative solutions.
> WebCore/inspector/front-end/SourceView.js:240 > + this.localSourceFrame = new WebInspector.SourceFrame(this.localContentElement, null, null, null, null); > just pass single parameter.
Done.
Yury Semikhatsky
Comment 4
2010-06-04 06:26:44 PDT
Created
attachment 57868
[details]
patch
Pavel Feldman
Comment 5
2010-07-18 12:18:28 PDT
Comment on
attachment 57868
[details]
patch As we agreed, we need a better solution. Clearing r? for now.
Pavel Feldman
Comment 6
2011-02-08 11:24:17 PST
Obsolete.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug