WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
4000
Object.prototype is missing isPrototypeOf
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4000
Summary
Object.prototype is missing isPrototypeOf
Geoffrey Garen
Reported
2005-07-14 10:41:10 PDT
Section 15.2.4 of ECMA-262
Attachments
Implement isPrototypeOf
(7.28 KB, patch)
2005-12-14 07:47 PST
,
Anders Carlsson
darin
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Anders Carlsson
Comment 1
2005-12-14 07:47:09 PST
Created
attachment 5078
[details]
Implement isPrototypeOf
Darin Adler
Comment 2
2005-12-14 09:44:00 PST
Comment on
attachment 5078
[details]
Implement isPrototypeOf r=me
Darin Adler
Comment 3
2005-12-14 09:44:44 PST
Comment on
attachment 5078
[details]
Implement isPrototypeOf Wait, should this work for a non-object value if that just happens to be set as the prototype?
Anders Carlsson
Comment 4
2005-12-14 10:03:55 PST
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (From update of
attachment 5078
[details]
[edit]) > Wait, should this work for a non-object value if that just happens to be set as > the prototype? >
I don't think so, since you can't invoke methods on non-objects, and they can't have prototype properties anyway, but maybe I'm misunderstanding something
Geoffrey Garen
Comment 5
2005-12-14 10:40:32 PST
I don't think it's right to test for v being NULL. JSValues should never be null, only jsNull().
Darin Adler
Comment 6
2005-12-17 09:01:41 PST
(In reply to
comment #5
)
> I don't think it's right to test for v being NULL. JSValues should never be null, only jsNull().
That's a good point. The check for 0/NULL is unnecessary and should omitted.
Darin Adler
Comment 7
2005-12-17 09:04:53 PST
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (In reply to
comment #3
) > > Wait, should this work for a non-object value if that just happens to be set as the prototype? > > I don't think so, since you can't invoke methods on non-objects, and they can't have prototype properties > anyway, but maybe I'm misunderstanding something
You're right. I had it backwards. To restate what you said in a more confusing but more thorough way, "this" must be an object so we don't have to look at non- object prototypes since they can't possibly be equal to this. And the argument to the method is the object to find a prototype "of". Thus if the argument is not an object we instantly know "this" is not its prototype since only objects have prototypes.
Anders Carlsson
Comment 8
2005-12-18 05:29:05 PST
Committed (with some small changes that Geoffrey approved)
Diego Pino
Comment 9
2021-06-08 07:03:11 PDT
Comment hidden (spam)
bug.
Diego Pino
Comment 10
2022-01-02 19:41:24 PST
Comment hidden (spam)
bug.
Diego Pino
Comment 11
2024-05-27 07:11:55 PDT
Comment hidden (spam)
bug
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug