Move some member variables around to reduce class sizes.
Created attachment 55787 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 55787 [details] Patch Do we need comments in any of these places to warn people against moving these members back again? r=me
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 55787 [details]) > Do we need comments in any of these places to warn people against moving these members back again? > > r=me The AtomicString change seems the most likely to be undone by accident as this change will break what http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/56100 tried to accomplish.
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (From update of attachment 55787 [details] [details]) > > Do we need comments in any of these places to warn people against moving these members back again? > > > > r=me > > The AtomicString change seems the most likely to be undone by accident as this change will break what http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/56100 tried to accomplish. We could add a compile time assert that sizeof(AtomicString) == sizeof(String).
Committed r59197: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/59197>
> We could add a compile time assert that sizeof(AtomicString) == sizeof(String). Anders added it in <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/59198>.
<rdar://problem/7978054>